• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舍曲林或丙咪嗪对慢性和双重抑郁症急性治疗反应的预测因素。

Predictors of response to acute treatment of chronic and double depression with sertraline or imipramine.

作者信息

Hirschfeld R M, Russell J M, Delgado P L, Fawcett J, Friedman R A, Harrison W M, Koran L M, Miller I W, Thase M E, Howland R H, Connolly M A, Miceli R J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston 77555-0429, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;59(12):669-75. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n1205.

DOI:10.4088/jcp.v59n1205
PMID:9921701
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature on predictors of response to treatment of nonchronic major depression has identified shorter duration of illness, acute onset, and less severity of illness as positive predictors. Unfortunately, there are almost no data on predictors of response to treatment for chronic depression. This study examined predictors of response to pharmacotherapy (sertraline or imipramine) in the treatment of outpatients who had DSM-III-R-defined chronic major or double depression.

METHOD

The acute phase of the Chronic Major Depression and Double Depression Study is a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group 12-week comparison of sertraline and imipramine. Analyses are based on 623 patients who comprised the intent-to-treat sample, of whom 299 were nonresponders and 324 were responders, defined by a priori criteria as either remission or satisfactory therapeutic response. A stepwise logistic multiple regression analysis was performed on candidate clinical, psychosocial, and demographic variables previously identified as statistically significant in an attempt to develop a predictive model of positive antidepressant response.

RESULTS

The sociodemographic variables that were predictive of positive response included living with spouse or partner or being at least a high school graduate. With regard to symptomatology and clinical history, responders had significantly lower baseline depression severity scores. In general, comorbid anxiety, substance abuse, and personality disorders did not influence rates of response. However, the presence of depressive personality traits was associated with a higher nonresponse rate. Among psychosocial variables, longer duration of personal relationships as well as higher baseline quality of life were associated with positive response. A stepwise logistic multiple regression identified 5 variables-living with spouse or partner, higher educational level, passive-aggressive personality, lower introverted-tense personality traits, and higher quality of life--that significantly and independently contributed to the predictive model. This model correctly classified 67% of patients.

CONCLUSION

A higher baseline quality of life, living with spouse or partner, and having more education were the strongest predictors of response to acute pharmacotherapy among chronically depressed patients. Clinical variables and comorbidity were not identified as independent predictors, although personality traits did appear to influence treatment response. Overall, the predictive value of these baseline measures was modest, and therefore of limited clinical utility.

摘要

背景

关于非慢性重度抑郁症治疗反应预测因素的文献表明,病程较短、急性起病和病情较轻是积极的预测因素。不幸的是,关于慢性抑郁症治疗反应预测因素的数据几乎没有。本研究调查了接受DSM-III-R定义的慢性重度或双重抑郁症门诊患者药物治疗(舍曲林或丙咪嗪)反应的预测因素。

方法

慢性重度抑郁症和双重抑郁症研究的急性期是一项双盲、随机、平行组的12周舍曲林和丙咪嗪对比研究。分析基于623名构成意向性治疗样本的患者,其中299名无反应者和324名反应者,根据预先设定的标准定义为缓解或满意的治疗反应。对先前确定具有统计学意义的候选临床、心理社会和人口统计学变量进行逐步逻辑多元回归分析,试图建立抗抑郁药阳性反应的预测模型。

结果

预测阳性反应的社会人口统计学变量包括与配偶或伴侣同住或至少是高中毕业生。在症状学和临床病史方面,反应者的基线抑郁严重程度评分显著较低。一般来说,共病焦虑、药物滥用和人格障碍不影响反应率。然而,抑郁性人格特质的存在与较高的无反应率相关。在心理社会变量中,人际关系持续时间较长以及基线生活质量较高与阳性反应相关。逐步逻辑多元回归确定了5个变量——与配偶或伴侣同住、教育水平较高、被动攻击型人格、内向紧张人格特质较低以及生活质量较高——这些变量对预测模型有显著且独立的贡献。该模型正确分类了67%的患者。

结论

较高的基线生活质量、与配偶或伴侣同住以及接受更多教育是慢性抑郁症患者急性药物治疗反应的最强预测因素。临床变量和共病未被确定为独立预测因素,尽管人格特质似乎确实影响治疗反应。总体而言,这些基线测量的预测价值不大,因此临床效用有限。

相似文献

1
Predictors of response to acute treatment of chronic and double depression with sertraline or imipramine.舍曲林或丙咪嗪对慢性和双重抑郁症急性治疗反应的预测因素。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;59(12):669-75. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n1205.
2
Chronic depression and comorbid personality disorders: response to sertraline versus imipramine.慢性抑郁症与共病性人格障碍:舍曲林与丙咪嗪的疗效对比
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 May;64(5):554-61. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0510.
3
The treatment of chronic depression, part 2: a double-blind, randomized trial of sertraline and imipramine.慢性抑郁症的治疗,第2部分:舍曲林和丙咪嗪的双盲随机试验
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;59(11):598-607. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n1107.
4
The treatment of chronic depression, part 3: psychosocial functioning before and after treatment with sertraline or imipramine.慢性抑郁症的治疗,第3部分:舍曲林或丙咪嗪治疗前后的社会心理功能
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;59(11):608-19. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v59n1108.
5
Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in chronic depression.慢性抑郁症中舍曲林与丙咪嗪治疗反应的性别差异。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;157(9):1445-52. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.9.1445.
6
The treatment of chronic depression, part 1: study design and rationale for evaluating the comparative efficacy of sertraline and imipramine as acute, crossover, continuation, and maintenance phase therapies.慢性抑郁症的治疗,第1部分:舍曲林和丙咪嗪作为急性、交叉、延续及维持期疗法的比较疗效评估的研究设计与原理
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;59(11):589-97.
7
Double-blind comparison of sertraline, imipramine, and placebo in the treatment of dysthymia: effects on personality.舍曲林、丙咪嗪和安慰剂治疗心境恶劣障碍的双盲比较:对人格的影响
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;157(9):1436-44. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.9.1436.
8
Effect of concurrent anxiety on response to sertraline and imipramine in patients with chronic depression.慢性抑郁症患者并发焦虑对舍曲林和丙咪嗪反应的影响。
Depress Anxiety. 2001;13(1):18-27. doi: 10.1002/1520-6394(2001)13:1<18::aid-da3>3.0.co;2-m.
9
Sertraline versus imipramine treatment of comorbid panic disorder and major depressive disorder.舍曲林与丙咪嗪治疗惊恐障碍合并重度抑郁症的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;64(6):654-62. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0606.
10
A placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial comparing sertraline and imipramine for the treatment of dysthymia.一项比较舍曲林和丙咪嗪治疗心境恶劣障碍的安慰剂对照随机临床试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Sep;53(9):777-84. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830090023004.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Variables Associated with Successful Treatment of Depression or Anxiety in Collaborative Care.协作式照护中与抑郁症或焦虑症成功治疗相关的临床变量
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;51(4):599-608. doi: 10.1007/s11414-024-09892-5. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
2
What predicts response to sertraline for people with depression in primary care? a secondary data analysis of moderators in the PANDA trial.什么因素可以预测在初级保健中接受舍曲林治疗的抑郁症患者的反应?PANDA 试验中调节因素的二次数据分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0300366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300366. eCollection 2024.
3
Incidence of treatment-resistant depression during the first mood depressive episode.
首次心境抑郁发作期间治疗抵抗性抑郁症的发生率。
Tunis Med. 2023 Mar 5;101(3):340-349.
4
Augmentation of Physician Assessments with Multi-Omics Enhances Predictability of Drug Response: A Case Study of Major Depressive Disorder.多组学增强医生评估可提高药物反应的可预测性:以重度抑郁症为例的案例研究
IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2018 Aug;13(3):20-31. doi: 10.1109/MCI.2018.2840660. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
The severity of psychiatric disorders.精神疾病的严重程度。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;17(3):258-275. doi: 10.1002/wps.20569.
6
Treatment-resistant depression: are animal models of depression fit for purpose?难治性抑郁症:抑郁症动物模型是否适用?
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Oct;232(19):3473-95. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4034-7. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
7
A molecular pathway analysis of the glutamatergic-monoaminergic interplay serves to investigate the number of depressive records during citalopram treatment.对谷氨酸能-单胺能相互作用的分子通路分析有助于研究西酞普兰治疗期间的抑郁记录数量。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015 Mar;122(3):465-75. doi: 10.1007/s00702-014-1267-2. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
8
Mood and Global Symptom Changes among Psychotherapy Clients with Depressive Personality.患有抑郁型人格的心理治疗来访者的情绪及整体症状变化
Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:208435. doi: 10.1155/2012/208435. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
9
Combination use of Beck Depression Inventory and two-question case-finding instrument as a screening tool for depression in the workplace.将贝克抑郁量表与双问题筛查工具联合使用作为工作场所抑郁症的筛查工具。
BMJ Open. 2012 May 7;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000596. Print 2012.
10
Change in psychosocial functioning and depressive symptoms during acute-phase cognitive therapy for depression.抑郁症急性期认知治疗期间心理社会功能及抑郁症状的变化
Psychol Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):317-26. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001279. Epub 2011 Jul 25.