Suppr超能文献

一次就诊与两次就诊根管治疗中牙髓坏死磨牙的炎症复发率。

Flare-up rate in pulpally necrotic molars in one-visit versus two-visit endodontic treatment.

作者信息

Eleazer P D, Eleazer K R

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, University of Louisville School of Dentistry, KY 40292, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 1998 Sep;24(9):614-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80122-2.

Abstract

This retrospective study compared one-visit versus two-visit endodontic treatment. The same technique and materials were used before and after making the sole change to one-visit endodontic treatment in 1991. Treatment records of 402 consecutive patients with pulpally necrotic first and second molars were compared. In 201 patients, treatment was provided by debridement and instrumentation, followed by obturation at a second visit; whereas the second group received single visit therapy. Flare-ups were defined as either patient reports of pain not controlled with over-the-counter medication or as increasing swelling. Sixteen flare-ups (8%) occurred in the two-visit group versus six flare-ups (3%) for the one-visit group. This showed an advantage for one-visit treatment at a 95% confidence level. In a second comparison, one-visit patients who had previously received two-visit treatment for a different pulpally necrotic molar served as their own control. No significant differences were present in this subgroup of 17 patients.

摘要

这项回顾性研究比较了一次性根管治疗与两次性根管治疗。在1991年将唯一的改变设定为一次性根管治疗前后,使用了相同的技术和材料。比较了402例连续的患有牙髓坏死的第一和第二磨牙患者的治疗记录。在201例患者中,治疗方法是清创和器械操作,然后在第二次就诊时进行充填;而第二组接受一次性治疗。突发疼痛被定义为患者报告非处方药物无法控制的疼痛或肿胀加剧。两次性治疗组出现16次突发疼痛(8%),而一次性治疗组出现6次突发疼痛(3%)。这表明在95%的置信水平下,一次性治疗具有优势。在第二项比较中,之前因另一颗牙髓坏死磨牙接受过两次性治疗的一次性治疗患者作为自身对照。在这17例患者的亚组中没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验