Davies H T
Department of Management, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK.
J Eval Clin Pract. 1998 Nov;4(4):359-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.1998.tb00099.x.
The past decade has seen the growing use of performance data in the hope of bringing about quality improvements in health care. Most recently, an emphasis on health outcomes (and especially mortality rates) has led to much activity around collecting and publishing such data. Two major problems intervene. What meanings can be ascribed to reported health outcomes? And what impacts are they likely to have on clinical performance? Much empirical work supports the assertion that reported outcomes may be poor indicators of service quality. In addition, the impact of these data may be small or even detrimental unless great care is made to connect the reporting with explicit quality-improving actions.
在过去十年中,人们越来越多地使用绩效数据,以期改善医疗保健质量。最近,对健康结果(尤其是死亡率)的重视引发了围绕此类数据收集和发布的大量活动。但有两个主要问题介入其中。报告的健康结果能赋予何种意义?它们可能对临床绩效产生何种影响?大量实证研究支持这样一种观点,即报告的结果可能并非服务质量的良好指标。此外,除非谨慎地将报告与明确的质量改进行动联系起来,否则这些数据的影响可能很小,甚至是有害的。