Bartoshuk L M, Duffy V B, Lucchina L A, Prutkin J, Fast K
Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8041, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Nov 30;855:793-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10660.x.
Taste blindness to phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and its chemical relative 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) was discovered in the 1930s. Family studies showed that those who could not taste PTC/PROP (nontasters) carried two recessive alleles. In recent years, we have classified tasters into two groups: medium (PROP is moderately bitter) and supertasters (PROP is intensely bitter). With our classification, approximately 25% of Americans are nontasters, 50%, medium tasters, and 25%, supertasters. Studies showed that supertasters form a cohesive group. Anatomical studies showed that supertasters have the most fungiform papillae. Psychophysical studies showed that supertasters perceive the most intense bitterness and sweetness from a variety of compounds, the most intense burn from oral irritants, and the most intense tactile sensations from viscous solutions. Oral burn and touch are presumably perceived to be the most intense to supertasters because taste buds in fungiform papillae are innervated by the trigeminal nerve (pain, touch) as well as the chorda tympani nerve (taste). The psychophysical scaling method used was magnitude matching with NaCl as the control modality. With this method, subjects rated the intensities of a series of NaCl and PROP solutions. The assumption that the taste of NaCl did not vary with PROP status allowed comparisons of the bitterness of PROP across subjects. Early magnitude matching studies, using sound as the control, had suggested that this assumption was reasonable. However, recent studies challenged that conclusion. Larger samples with more diverse populations, using sound as the control, showed that the taste of NaCl varied with PROP bitterness; supertasters perceived the strongest taste and nontasters, the weakest. Thus our earlier conclusions were conservative because differences between nontasters, medium tasters, and supertasters were concealed by using NaCl as a standard. Using magnitude matching with sound as the standard, or using the Green scale, which employs intensity labels, we found that the differences between PROP groups are larger. Note that the association between PROP status and salt taste is interesting in itself, since variability in salt taste may have important nutritional consequences.
对苯硫脲(PTC)及其化学相关物6 - n - 丙基硫氧嘧啶(PROP)的味觉失敏现象于20世纪30年代被发现。家族研究表明,那些尝不出PTC/PROP味道的人(非尝味者)携带两个隐性等位基因。近年来,我们将尝味者分为两组:中等尝味者(PROP味道适中苦)和超级尝味者(PROP味道极苦)。根据我们的分类,大约25%的美国人是非尝味者,50%是中等尝味者,25%是超级尝味者。研究表明,超级尝味者构成一个紧密的群体。解剖学研究表明,超级尝味者的菌状乳头最多。心理物理学研究表明,超级尝味者能从各种化合物中感受到最强烈的苦味和甜味,从口腔刺激物中感受到最强烈的灼烧感,从粘性溶液中感受到最强烈的触觉。口腔灼烧感和触感对超级尝味者来说可能被认为是最强烈的,因为菌状乳头中的味蕾由三叉神经(疼痛、触觉)以及鼓索神经(味觉)支配。所使用的心理物理学标度方法是用氯化钠作为对照模态进行量级匹配。用这种方法,受试者对一系列氯化钠和PROP溶液的强度进行评分。氯化钠的味道不随PROP状态而变化这一假设使得能够在不同受试者之间比较PROP的苦味。早期以声音作为对照的量级匹配研究表明这一假设是合理的。然而,最近的研究对这一结论提出了质疑。使用声音作为对照、样本量更大且人群更多样化的研究表明,氯化钠的味道随PROP苦味而变化;超级尝味者感受到的味道最强,非尝味者最弱。因此我们早期的结论较为保守,因为用氯化钠作为标准掩盖了非尝味者、中等尝味者和超级尝味者之间的差异。以声音作为标准进行量级匹配,或者使用采用强度标签的格林标度,我们发现PROP组之间的差异更大。需要注意的是,PROP状态与盐味之间的关联本身就很有趣,因为盐味的变化可能会产生重要的营养后果。