Suppr超能文献

血小板输注无效的预防与管理

Prevention and management of platelet transfusion refractoriness.

作者信息

Novotny V M

机构信息

Blood Bank Leidsenhage, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 1999;76(1):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000031013.

Abstract

Platelet transfusion refractoriness is a major complication of long-term platelet supportive care. Refractoriness may lead to fatal bleeding complications in thrombocytopenic patients. Major factors involved are factors related to the clinical condition of the patient as well as HLA alloimmunisation. Non-alloimmune factors may occur in up to 80% of the patients. However, platelet transfusion outcome is impaired in only 50% of the patients having these conditions. HLA alloimmunisation has been convincingly reduced by the use of leucocyte-depleted transfusions. UV-B irradiation of platelet transfusions may be alternatively used to reduce HLA alloimmunisation. Despite these measures, patients with a history of pregnancy or non-leucocyte-depleted transfusions form HLA antibodies in a high proportion (up to 50%). HPA antibodies play a minor but relatively important role in patients with HLA antibodies. ABO antibodies may play a role in refractoriness, which can be abolished by transfusion of ABO-identical platelets. Screening for the presence of HLA and/or HPA antibodies is indicated in case of transfusion failure after ABO-identical or HLA-matched platelets. If no alloantibodies are detected, further analysis to define a role of drug- related or autoantibodies is required. In case of HLA and/or HPA alloimmunisation associated with refractoriness, matched platelet transfusions are indicated. In case of non-alloimmune factors associated with increased platelet consumption, increasing the transfusion frequency can be considered. Additional investigations are still necessary to define risk factors for secondary HLA alloimmunisation and refractoriness due to non-immune factors to further decrease the incidence of refractoriness.

摘要

血小板输注无效是长期血小板支持治疗的主要并发症。输注无效可能导致血小板减少患者出现致命的出血并发症。主要相关因素包括与患者临床状况相关的因素以及人类白细胞抗原(HLA)同种免疫。非同种免疫因素在高达80%的患者中可能出现。然而,在有这些情况的患者中,只有50%的患者血小板输注效果受到损害。通过使用去白细胞输血,HLA同种免疫已得到令人信服的降低。血小板输注的紫外线B照射可作为替代方法用于减少HLA同种免疫。尽管采取了这些措施,有妊娠史或接受过未去白细胞输血的患者中仍有很大比例(高达50%)会形成HLA抗体。血小板特异性抗原(HPA)抗体在有HLA抗体的患者中起次要但相对重要的作用。ABO抗体可能在输注无效中起作用,输注ABO血型相同的血小板可消除这种作用。在输注ABO血型相同或HLA配型的血小板后出现输血失败的情况下,需要筛查是否存在HLA和/或HPA抗体。如果未检测到同种抗体,则需要进一步分析以确定药物相关或自身抗体的作用。在与输注无效相关的HLA和/或HPA同种免疫的情况下,应输注配型的血小板。在与血小板消耗增加相关的非同种免疫因素的情况下,可以考虑增加输血频率。仍需要进行更多研究以确定继发性HLA同种免疫和非免疫因素导致的输注无效的危险因素,以进一步降低输注无效的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验