• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

LOT测试与学龄儿童。

The LOT test and school-age children.

作者信息

Behnke C R, Lankford J E

出版信息

J Speech Hear Disord. 1976 Nov;41(4):498-502. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4104.498.

DOI:10.1044/jshd.4104.498
PMID:994480
Abstract

The LOT test was administered to 100 normal-hearing subjects ranging in age from seven years, six months to 10 years, six months. The test was conducted at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz with 99 subjects who were able to perform the required task. The LOT test misclassified (false-positive result) only 4% of the normal-hearing children at 1000 Hz. The test misclassified 3% at 2000 Hz, 3% at 4000 Hz, and 14% at 500 Hz. A new criterion for the use of the LOT test with children is proposed which reduced the percentage of misclassification to 2% at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. The frequency of 500 Hz is not recommended for the preadolescent population.

摘要

对100名年龄在7岁6个月至10岁6个月之间的听力正常受试者进行了LOT测试。对99名能够完成所需任务的受试者在500、1000、2000和4000赫兹频率下进行了测试。在1000赫兹时,LOT测试仅将4%的听力正常儿童误分类(假阳性结果)。在2000赫兹时测试误分类率为3%,4000赫兹时为3%,500赫兹时为14%。提出了一项针对儿童使用LOT测试的新标准,该标准在1000、2000和4000赫兹时将误分类率降至2%。不建议对青春期前人群使用500赫兹频率。

相似文献

1
The LOT test and school-age children.LOT测试与学龄儿童。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1976 Nov;41(4):498-502. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4104.498.
2
Nonorganic overlay in noise-induced hearing loss.噪声性听力损失中的非器质性叠加
Proc R Soc Med. 1971 Feb;64(2):194-9.
3
[On functional hearing loss in children].[关于儿童功能性听力损失]
HNO. 1967 Nov;15(11):343-6.
4
The auditory malingerer.听觉诈病者。
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1970 Nov;70(3):263-71.
5
The evaluation of suspected non-organic hearing loss.疑似非器质性听力损失的评估。
J Laryngol Otol. 1968 Aug;82(8):693-705. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100069346.
6
Effects of sophistication on four tests for nonorganic hearing loss.成熟度对四项非器质性听力损失测试的影响。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1977 Nov;42(4):528-34. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4204.528.
7
[Objective audiometry in the diagnosis of malingering].[客观听力测试在诈病诊断中的应用]
Med Pregl. 1976;29(5-6):283-5.
8
Marked high-frequency hearing loss in children: a problem in early identification.儿童显著高频听力损失:早期识别中的一个问题。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1977 Aug;42(3):335-9. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4203.335.
9
Letter: Comment on article by Martin and Monro on simulated hearing loss and type V Bekesy tracing.信件:对马丁和蒙罗关于模拟听力损失及V型贝凯西听力描记图的文章的评论
J Speech Hear Disord. 1976 May;41(2):282-3. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4102.282.
10
Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening.全州范围内新生儿普遍听力筛查的预计成本效益。
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):855-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.855.