• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性鼻窦炎的比较。

Azithromycin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute sinusitis.

作者信息

Klapan I, Culig J, Oresković K, Matrapazovski M, Radosević S

机构信息

Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Zagreb University School of Medicine, Croatia.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 1999 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(99)90044-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0709(99)90044-3
PMID:9950107
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a 3-day course of azithromycin with a 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of acute sinusitis in adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred adult patients with acute sinusitis were included in an open, randomized study. Clinical diagnosis of sinusitis was confirmed by nasal endoscopy, sinus radiography, and (when possible) by culture of sinus aspirate. Patients were randomized to receive azithromycin (500 mg once daily for 3 days) or amoxicillin/clavulanate (625 mg every 8 hours for 10 days).

RESULTS

A significantly faster resolution of signs and symptoms of sinusitis was observed in the azithromycin-treated patients. By the end of therapy (days 10-12), 95% of the patients in the azithromycin group and 74% in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group were cured. The remaining patients' conditions were improved. By the follow-up visit, cure was achieved in 98% of the azithromycin-treated patients, and 91% of the amoxicillin/clavulanate-treated patients. Treatment failure was observed in three patients from the amoxicillin/clavulanate group, and relapse occurred in one patient from each group. Bacteriologic eradication was achieved in 23 of 23 and 21 of 24 patients treated with azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate, respectively. Both drugs were well tolerated. Two patients (4%) from the azithromycin group and five patients (10%) from the amoxicillin/clavulanate group reported mild gastrointestinal disturbances.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with acute sinusitis, a 3-day course of azithromycin was as effective and well tolerated as a 10-day course of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. A significantly simpler dosage regimen and faster clinical effect were the advantages of azithromycin.

摘要

目的

比较阿奇霉素3日疗程与阿莫西林/克拉维酸10日疗程治疗成人急性鼻窦炎的疗效和耐受性。

患者与方法

100例成人急性鼻窦炎患者纳入一项开放、随机研究。鼻窦炎的临床诊断通过鼻内镜检查、鼻窦X线摄影以及(可能时)鼻窦抽吸物培养来确诊。患者随机接受阿奇霉素(500mg,每日1次,共3天)或阿莫西林/克拉维酸(625mg,每8小时1次,共10天)治疗。

结果

阿奇霉素治疗的患者中,鼻窦炎的体征和症状缓解明显更快。治疗结束时(第10 - 12天),阿奇霉素组95%的患者和阿莫西林/克拉维酸组74%的患者治愈。其余患者病情改善。随访时,阿奇霉素治疗的患者中98%治愈,阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的患者中91%治愈。阿莫西林/克拉维酸组有3例患者治疗失败,两组各有1例患者复发。阿奇霉素治疗的23例患者和阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗的24例患者中分别有23例和21例实现细菌清除。两种药物耐受性均良好。阿奇霉素组2例患者(4%)和阿莫西林/克拉维酸组5例患者(10%)报告有轻度胃肠道不适。

结论

在成人急性鼻窦炎患者中,阿奇霉素3日疗程与阿莫西林/克拉维酸10日疗程疗效相当且耐受性良好。阿奇霉素的优势在于给药方案明显更简单且临床效果更快。

相似文献

1
Azithromycin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute sinusitis.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性鼻窦炎的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 1999 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(99)90044-3.
2
Once daily clarithromycin extended-release vs twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanate in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis: a randomized, investigator-blinded study.急性细菌性鼻窦炎患者每日一次服用克拉霉素缓释剂与每日两次服用阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐的疗效比较:一项随机、研究者设盲的研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jan;21(1):61-70. doi: 10.1185/030079904x18009.
3
A multicenter, open label trial of azithromycin vs. amoxicillin/ clavulanate for the management of acute otitis media in children.一项比较阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的多中心开放标签试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S15-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00003.
4
Randomized double-blind study comparing 3- and 6-day regimens of azithromycin with a 10-day amoxicillin-clavulanate regimen for treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.一项随机双盲研究,比较阿奇霉素3天和6天疗程与阿莫西林-克拉维酸10天疗程治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Sep;47(9):2770-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2770-2774.2003.
5
A multicenter, randomized, open label comparison of azithromycin and amoxicillin/clavulanate in acute otitis media among children attending day care or school.一项针对日托或学校儿童急性中耳炎的阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸盐的多中心、随机、开放标签比较研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S24-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00005.
6
A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study of 5- and 10-day gatifloxacin versus 10-day amoxicillin/clavulanate in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis.一项多中心、随机、研究者设盲的研究,比较5天和10天加替沙星与10天阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎患者的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2002 Feb;24(2):269-81. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85023-8.
7
Azithromycin extended release vs amoxicillin/clavulanate: symptom resolution in acute sinusitis.阿奇霉素缓释剂与阿莫西林/克拉维酸:急性鼻窦炎的症状缓解。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2008.08.011. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
8
A multicenter, double blind comparison of azithromycin and amoxicillin/ clavulanate for the treatment of acute otitis media in children.阿奇霉素与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗儿童急性中耳炎的多中心、双盲比较
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Sep;15(9 Suppl):S20-3. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199609009-00004.
9
Large dosage amoxicillin/clavulanate, compared with azithromycin, for the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media in children.大剂量阿莫西林/克拉维酸与阿奇霉素治疗儿童细菌性急性中耳炎的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Jun;24(6):525-32. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000164794.50281.1a.
10
A randomized controlled trial of azithromycin and amoxycillin/clavulanate in the management of subacute childhood rhinosinusitis.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2000 Aug;36(4):378-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00526.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin in treating sinusitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails.阿奇霉素治疗鼻窦炎患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Mar 20;87(4):2324-2335. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003182. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Can the Future of ID Escape the Inertial Dogma of Its Past? The Exemplars of Shorter Is Better and Oral Is the New IV.身份识别的未来能否摆脱其过去的惯性教条?“越短越好”以及“口服是新的静脉注射”的范例。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 29;10(1):ofac706. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac706. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
The prevalence of bacterial infection in acute rhinosinusitis: a Systematic review and meta-analysis.
急性鼻窦炎中细菌感染的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):57-69. doi: 10.1002/lary.24709. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
4
Short-course antimicrobial therapy of respiratory tract infections.呼吸道感染的短程抗菌治疗。
Drugs. 2003;63(20):2169-84. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363200-00002.
5
Randomized double-blind study comparing 3- and 6-day regimens of azithromycin with a 10-day amoxicillin-clavulanate regimen for treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.一项随机双盲研究,比较阿奇霉素3天和6天疗程与阿莫西林-克拉维酸10天疗程治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Sep;47(9):2770-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2770-2774.2003.