Riffer Ernie, Spiller Joy, Palmer Robert, Shortridge Virginia, Busman Todd A, Valdes Joaquin
Central Phoenix Medical Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85014, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jan;21(1):61-70. doi: 10.1185/030079904x18009.
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) to amoxicillin/ clavulanate in patients diagnosed with acute bacterial sinusitis.
In a controlled, multicenter, investigator-blinded study, 437 ambulatory patients at least 12 years old with signs/symptoms and radiographic findings of acute sinusitis were randomized to receive clarithromycin ER 1000 mg once daily or amoxicillin/ clavulanate 875 mg/l25 mg twice daily for 14 days.
Clinical and bacteriological response rates were determined at a test-of-cure visit, which was conducted up to 10 days following the completion of treatment. Radiological response was assessed at a follow-up visit.
The clinical cure rate in clinically evaluable patients was 98% (184/188) in the clarithromycin ER group and 97% (179/185) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (95% CI for the difference in rates [-2.4%, 4.7%]). Clinical cure was sustained at the follow-up visit (96% for each treatment group). The pathogen eradication rates were 94% (61/65) in the clarithromycin ER group and 98% (61/62) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (95% CI for difference in rates [-12.0%, 2.9%]). The radiological success rate was 94% (172/183) in both the clarithromycin ER and amoxicillin/clavulanate groups (95% CI for difference in rates [-4.9%, 4.9%]). Symptomatic improvement or relief was observed as early as 2 days-5 days after the initiation of study drug, with a statistically significantly higher resolution rate of sinus pressure (p = 0.027) and improvement/resolution rate of nasal congestion (p = 0.035) during treatment with clarithromycin ER. The resolution/improvement rate at the test-of-cure visit for each treatment group was > or = 94% for the primary acute sinusitis signs/symptoms, with a statistically significantly higher resolution/improvement rate of purulent nasal discharge with clarithromycin ER (p = 0.010). Both study drugs had a positive and rapid impact on quality of life. Patients reported a high level of satisfaction and probability of using either study antibiotic again, and health care resource use was low, with slightly fewer sinusitis-related physician and outpatient visits required by patients in the clarithromycin ER group (p = 0.055). The treatment groups were comparable with respect to incidence of drug-related adverse events.
In this multinational population of patients with acute bacterial sinusitis, clarithromycin ER was comparable, and for selected measures superior, to amoxicillin/clavulanate based on clinical, bacteriological, and radiological responses as well as quality of life measures, satisfaction with antibiotic therapy, and health care resource utilization.
比较克拉霉素缓释片(ER)与阿莫西林/克拉维酸对诊断为急性细菌性鼻窦炎患者的疗效和耐受性。
在一项对照、多中心、研究者设盲的研究中,437例至少12岁、有急性鼻窦炎体征/症状及影像学表现的门诊患者被随机分为两组,一组接受每日1次1000mg克拉霉素缓释片治疗,另一组接受每日2次875mg/125mg阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗,疗程均为14天。
在治疗结束后至多10天进行的治愈检查访视中确定临床和细菌学缓解率。在随访访视时评估影像学缓解情况。
在可进行临床评估的患者中,克拉霉素缓释片组的临床治愈率为98%(184/188),阿莫西林/克拉维酸组为97%(179/185)(两组治愈率差异的95%置信区间为[-2.4%,4.7%])。随访时临床治愈情况得以维持(各治疗组均为96%)。克拉霉素缓释片组的病原体根除率为94%(61/65),阿莫西林/克拉维酸组为98%(61/62)(两组根除率差异的95%置信区间为[-12.0%,2.9%])。克拉霉素缓释片组和阿莫西林/克拉维酸组的影像学成功率均为94%(172/183)(两组成功率差异的95%置信区间为[-4.9%,4.9%])。早在开始使用研究药物后2天至5天就观察到症状改善或缓解,在克拉霉素缓释片治疗期间,鼻窦压痛的缓解率(p = 0.027)和鼻塞的改善/缓解率(p = 0.035)在统计学上显著更高。各治疗组在治愈检查访视时,主要急性鼻窦炎体征/症状的缓解/改善率均≥94%,克拉霉素缓释片治疗脓性鼻涕的缓解/改善率在统计学上显著更高(p = 0.010)。两种研究药物对生活质量均有积极且快速的影响。患者报告满意度高且再次使用任一研究抗生素的可能性大,医疗资源使用少,克拉霉素缓释片组患者因鼻窦炎相关的看医生次数和门诊就诊次数略少(p = 0.055)。治疗组在药物相关不良事件发生率方面具有可比性。
在这个多国急性细菌性鼻窦炎患者群体中,基于临床、细菌学和影像学反应以及生活质量指标、对抗生素治疗的满意度和医疗资源利用情况,克拉霉素缓释片与阿莫西林/克拉维酸相当,且在某些指标上更优。