A long follow-up on prostate specific antigen density and prostate biopsy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) in a risk population without evidence of prostatic cancer, and to assess the long-term usefulness of PSAD as a parameter for determining the need for a prostatic biopsy in patients with a normal digital rectal examination (DRE) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS).

METHODS

The records of 582 patients referred to the clinic between February, 1992 and February, 1994 were studied retrospectively. All these patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were evaluated based on the following parameters: digital rectal examination, serum PSA levels, prostate volume measured using transrectal ultrasound and PSAD. Prostatic biopsy was performed on 431 patients who had a serum PSA level greater than 4.0 ng/mL. A total of 299 patients (69.3%) had PSA levels between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/mL and represented the target population. The study had two parts, in the first one cancer was diagnosed just by one biopsy and in part II, the patients with negative biopsy in part I were followed for a two-year period and required 2 or 3 biopsies for diagnosis. Of the total of patients who had a negative prostate biopsy in part I of the study, 269 were followed for a period of two years with repeated prostate biopsies.

RESULTS

Overall prostate cancer was detected in 22/299 (13.9%) patients, 6/105 (5.7%) with PSAD up to 0.15 and 16/194 (8.2%) with PSAD over 0.15 (p = 0.569).

CONCLUSION

PSAD is a useful indicator in decreasing the number of negative biopsies in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, in a long-term follow-up the PSAD (cutoff level 0.15) was unable to predict which patients had a positive biopsy. According to our results, 5.6% of patients with prostate cancer will be missed using the PSAD criteria.