• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[用于测量环性心境障碍性抑郁严重程度的评估量表与性能测试的比较]

[Comparison of evaluation scales and performance tests for measuring the severity of cyclothymic depressions].

作者信息

Lehrl S, Straub R, Straub B

出版信息

Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1976 Sep;9(5):247-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094499.

DOI:10.1055/s-0028-1094499
PMID:996089
Abstract

Usually the severeness of cyclothymical depression is assessed by self-or arbiter's evaluation scales. These assessments are influenced by - mainly verbal - disturbing variables that hitherto may hardly be controlled. Measurements of performance provide less falsified results. However, they are influenced by the premorbid level of general intelligence and by the age of the patient. These disturbing variables, however, can be controlled rather well. Empirical investigations show that the assessment of the severeness of cyclothymical depression measured by performance tests of evaluation scales leads to different results. Nevertheless, both types of tests are valid for measuring depressions. Therefore, both are to be taken into account for assessment of severeness.

摘要

通常,环形心境障碍性抑郁的严重程度是通过自我或他人评估量表来评定的。这些评估受到——主要是言语方面的——干扰变量的影响,而这些变量迄今为止几乎无法得到控制。行为表现测量能提供较少失真的结果。然而,它们会受到病前总体智力水平和患者年龄的影响。不过,这些干扰变量是可以得到较好控制的。实证研究表明,通过评估量表的行为测试来测量环形心境障碍性抑郁的严重程度会得出不同的结果。尽管如此,这两种测试类型在测量抑郁症方面都是有效的。因此,在评估严重程度时,两者都应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of evaluation scales and performance tests for measuring the severity of cyclothymic depressions].[用于测量环性心境障碍性抑郁严重程度的评估量表与性能测试的比较]
Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol. 1976 Sep;9(5):247-56. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1094499.
2
[Cyclothymic depression and performance. Comparison of the efficiency of agitated and non-agitated cyclothymic depression patients on a brief test of severe depression].[环性心境障碍性抑郁与表现。在一项重度抑郁简短测试中对激越性与非激越性环性心境障碍性抑郁患者效率的比较]
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1976 Aug;28(8):500-8.
3
International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.胞浆内单精子注射受孕、体外受精受孕及自然受孕5岁儿童结局的国际合作研究:认知与运动评估
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e283-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1445.
4
[Percentile distribution of depression scales of the AMDP system].[AMDP系统抑郁量表的百分位数分布]
Nervenarzt. 1990 Mar;61(3):183-5.
5
Evidence for two types of bipolar depression using a dimensional approach.使用维度方法证明双相抑郁症的两种类型。
Psychother Psychosom. 2007;76(6):325-31. doi: 10.1159/000107559.
6
A tetrachoric factor analysis validation of mixed depression.混合性抑郁症的四分相关因素分析验证
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan 1;32(1):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.08.005. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
7
Psychological measurements in Psychopharmacology. Introduction.精神药理学中的心理测量。引言。
Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1974;7(0):1-7.
8
Rating scales in bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍中的评定量表。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;22(1):42-9. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328315a4d2.
9
[Self-rating scales for manic episodes].[躁狂发作的自评量表]
Psychiatr Prax. 2006 Mar;33 Suppl 1:S55-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-867025.
10
Borderline personality disorder characteristics in young adults with recurrent mood disorders: a comparison of bipolar and unipolar depression.复发性情绪障碍青年成人的边缘型人格障碍特征:双相抑郁与单相抑郁的比较
J Affect Disord. 2005 Jul;87(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2005.02.019.

引用本文的文献

1
[Investigation of the suitability of efficiency tests in evaluating endogenous depression (author's transl)].关于效率测试在评估内源性抑郁症中的适用性研究(作者译)
Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1978 Dec 14;226(3):215-27. doi: 10.1007/BF00341712.