• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鲁夫-光轨学习测试(RULIT)的因素效度验证。

Factorial validation of the Ruff-Light Trail Learning Test (RULIT).

作者信息

Allen C C, Ruff R M

机构信息

Tates Creek Centre Drive, Suite 308, Lexington, Kentucky 40517, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 1999 Mar;6(1):43-50. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600105.

DOI:10.1177/107319119900600105
PMID:9971882
Abstract

The factorial validity of the Ruff-Light Trail Learning Test (RULIT) was evaluated for its specificity as a test of visuospatial learning and memory. In a sample of 307 normal adults, principal components analyses (PCAs) were calculated on scores from the RULIT and selected neuropsychological tests. The PCAs revealed visuospatial learning and memory components, which included RULIT scores that were empirically distinct from verbal learning and memory components. These results provide support for the RULIT as a measure of visuospatial learning and memory.

摘要

对鲁夫-轻轨迹学习测试(RULIT)的因素效度进行了评估,以检验其作为视觉空间学习和记忆测试的特异性。在307名正常成年人的样本中,对RULIT和选定的神经心理学测试的分数进行了主成分分析(PCA)。主成分分析揭示了视觉空间学习和记忆成分,其中包括根据经验与言语学习和记忆成分不同的RULIT分数。这些结果为RULIT作为视觉空间学习和记忆的一种测量方法提供了支持。

相似文献

1
Factorial validation of the Ruff-Light Trail Learning Test (RULIT).鲁夫-光轨学习测试(RULIT)的因素效度验证。
Assessment. 1999 Mar;6(1):43-50. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600105.
2
Differential impairment of patients with right versus left hemisphere lesions on the Ruff-light Trail Learning Test.在鲁夫-光迹学习测试中,右半球与左半球病变患者的差异损伤。
Appl Neuropsychol. 2007;14(3):141-6. doi: 10.1080/09084280701508192.
3
Visuospatial learning: Ruff Light Trail Learning Test.视觉空间学习:鲁夫光轨迹学习测试
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;11(4):313-27.
4
Lateralizing seizure focus in presurgical patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: utility of the Ruff-Light Trail Learning Test.颞叶癫痫术前患者的癫痫发作灶定位:鲁夫-光轨迹学习测试的效用
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Aug;15(4):496-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
5
Spanish normative studies (NEURONORMA-Plus project): norms for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Modified Taylor Complex Figure, and the Ruff-Light Trail Learning Test.西班牙规范研究(NEURONORMA-Plus 项目):威斯康星卡片分类测验、改良泰勒复杂图形和 Ruff-Light 轨迹学习测验的常模。
Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2024 Apr;39(3):235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.05.014. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
6
Unique and shared validity of the "Wechsler logical memory test", the "California verbal learning test", and the "verbal learning and memory test" in patients with epilepsy.癫痫患者韦氏逻辑记忆测验、加利福尼亚词语学习测验和词语学习记忆测验的独特和共同有效性。
Epilepsy Res. 2009 Dec;87(2-3):203-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
7
Color Trails Test: normative data and criterion validity for the greek adult population.颜色连线测验:希腊成年人群的常模数据和效标效度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Jun;26(4):322-30. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acr027. Epub 2011 May 9.
8
Re-examining the factor structure of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning: implications for clinical interpretation.重新审视《广泛记忆与学习评估》的因素结构:对临床解释的影响。
Assessment. 1998 Jun;5(2):127-39. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500204.
9
Embedded Performance Validity Measures with Postdeployment Veterans: Cross-Validation and Efficiency with Multiple Measures.部署后退伍军人的嵌入式绩效效度测量:多种测量方法的交叉验证与效率
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2016;23(2):94-104. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2015.1014556. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
10
Three trail making tests for use in neuropsychological assessments with brief intertest intervals.三种用于神经心理评估的连线测试,测试间间隔较短。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;32(2):151-8. doi: 10.1080/13803390902881934. Epub 2009 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The challenge of neuropsychological assessment of visual/visuo-spatial memory: A critical, historical review, and lessons for the present and future.视觉/视觉空间记忆的神经心理学评估挑战:批判性的历史回顾以及对当下和未来的启示
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 23;13:962025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.962025. eCollection 2022.
2
A randomized clinical trial of plasticity-based cognitive training in mild traumatic brain injury.基于可塑性的认知训练治疗轻度创伤性脑损伤的随机临床试验。
Brain. 2021 Aug 17;144(7):1994-2008. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab202.
3
Potential New Approaches for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.
阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症诊断的潜在新方法
Front Neurol. 2020 Jun 5;11:496. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00496. eCollection 2020.
4
A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder.创伤后应激障碍神经认知功能的定量荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):105-140. doi: 10.1037/a0038039. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
5
Visuo-spatial path learning, stress, and cortisol secretion following military cadets' first parachute jump: the effect of increasing task complexity.视觉空间路径学习、应激和皮质醇分泌在军事学员首次跳伞后:增加任务复杂性的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Sep;11(3):332-43. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0043-0.
6
Integrated treatment approach improves cognitive function in demented and clinically depressed patients.综合治疗方法可改善痴呆和临床抑郁症患者的认知功能。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2005 Jan-Feb;20(1):21-6. doi: 10.1177/153331750502000103.