Vazquez-Levin M H, Goldberg S I, Friedmann P, Des Jarlais D C, Nagler H M
Department of Urology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Int J Androl. 1998 Dec;21(6):327-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.1998.00129.x.
The current World Health Organization guidelines (1992) suggest that the presence of > or = 30% normal sperm forms (i.e. PAP criteria) is consistent with normal semen quality. Critical evaluation of sperm morphology (CE; Kruger classification) has shown an excellent correlation with human in vitro fertilization. Utilizing Kruger criteria, > 14% normal sperm forms has been proposed as indicative of normal semen quality. We have performed a retrospective analysis on 261 individuals to assess the agreement between PAP and Kruger criteria for normal sperm morphology (NSM). When the threshold for NSM by PAP was set at 30%, a significant agreement was found between the percentage normal forms of both criteria (Kappa coefficient = 0.37; p < 0.001). Sixty-seven (92%) of the 73 men found to have abnormal sperm morphology by PAP had abnormal semen by Kruger classification. When the threshold for NSM by PAP was established at 50%, the Kappa coefficient was 0.48 (p < 0.001). Sixty of the 72 samples (83%) classified as normal by PAP staining were normal by Kruger criteria. Interestingly, when NSM by PAP was between 30 and 50%, the specimen was just as likely to have normal or abnormal sperm morphology by Kruger (40 vs. 60%, respectively). These results strongly suggest that a high or low percentage of NSM by PAP is in agreement with the Kruger classification. The excellent agreement of Kruger and WHO criteria at the extremes (< 30% and > 50%) may obviate the need for Kruger assessment. However, when WHO morphology is between 30 and 50%, the addition of Kruger evaluation may provide meaningful information to help better diagnose a patient and plan his treatment.
世界卫生组织现行指南(1992年)表明,正常精子形态占比≥30%(即巴氏染色标准)与正常精液质量相符。精子形态的严格评估(CE;克鲁格分类法)已显示出与人类体外受精具有良好的相关性。采用克鲁格标准,已提出正常精子形态占比>14%可作为正常精液质量的指标。我们对261名个体进行了回顾性分析,以评估巴氏染色标准和克鲁格标准在正常精子形态(NSM)方面的一致性。当巴氏染色标准的NSM阈值设定为30%时,发现两种标准的正常形态百分比之间存在显著一致性(卡帕系数=0.37;p<0.001)。在巴氏染色标准发现精子形态异常的73名男性中,有67名(92%)根据克鲁格分类法精液异常。当巴氏染色标准的NSM阈值设定为50%时,卡帕系数为0.48(p<0.001)。在巴氏染色法分类为正常的72个样本中,有60个(83%)根据克鲁格标准为正常。有趣的是,当巴氏染色标准的NSM在30%至50%之间时,根据克鲁格分类法,该样本具有正常或异常精子形态的可能性相同(分别为40%和60%)。这些结果强烈表明,巴氏染色标准的NSM百分比高或低与克鲁格分类法一致。在极端情况下(<30%和>50%),克鲁格标准与世界卫生组织标准的良好一致性可能使无需进行克鲁格评估。然而,当世界卫生组织形态学标准在30%至50%之间时,增加克鲁格评估可能会提供有意义的信息,以帮助更好地诊断患者并规划其治疗方案。