Shore-Lesserson L, Manspeizer H E, DePerio M, Francis S, Vela-Cantos F, Ergin M A
Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York 10029, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1999 Feb;88(2):312-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199902000-00016.
Transfusion therapy after cardiac surgery is empirically guided, partly due to a lack of specific point-of-care hemostasis monitors. In a randomized, blinded, prospective trial, we studied cardiac surgical patients at moderate to high risk of transfusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either a thromboelastography (TEG)-guided transfusion algorithm (n = 53) or routine transfusion therapy (n = 52) for intervention after cardiopulmonary bypass. Coagulation tests, TEG variables, mediastinal tube drainage, and transfusions were compared at multiple time points. There were no demographic or hemostatic test result differences between groups, and all patients were given prophylactic antifibrinolytic therapy. Intraoperative transfusion rates did not differ, but there were significantly fewer postoperative and total transfusions in the TEG group. The proportion of patients receiving fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) was 4 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 16 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.002). Patients receiving platelets were 7 of 53 in the TEG group compared with 15 of 52 in the control group (P < 0.05). Patients in the TEG group also received less volume of FFP (36 +/- 142 vs 217 +/- 463 mL; P < 0.04). Mediastinal tube drainage was not statistically different 6, 12, or 24 h postoperatively. Point-of-care coagulation monitoring using TEG resulted in fewer transfusions in the postoperative period. We conclude that the reduction in transfusions may have been due to improved hemostasis in these patients who had earlier and specific identification of the hemostasis abnormality and thus received more appropriate intraoperative transfusion therapy. These data support the use of TEG in an algorithm to guide transfusion therapy in complex cardiac surgery.
Transfusion of allogeneic blood products is common during complex cardiac surgical procedures. In a prospective, randomized trial, we compared a transfusion algorithm using point-of-care coagulation testing with routine laboratory testing, and found the algorithm to be effective in reducing transfusion requirements.
心脏手术后的输血治疗通常是经验性指导的,部分原因是缺乏特定的即时止血监测。在一项随机、双盲、前瞻性试验中,我们研究了输血风险为中到高的心脏手术患者。患者在体外循环后被随机分配至血栓弹力图(TEG)指导的输血方案组(n = 53)或常规输血治疗组(n = 52)进行干预。在多个时间点比较了凝血试验、TEG变量、纵隔引流管引流量和输血量。两组之间在人口统计学或止血试验结果上没有差异,并且所有患者均接受了预防性抗纤溶治疗。术中输血率没有差异,但TEG组术后输血和总输血量显著减少。TEG组接受新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)的患者比例为53例中的4例,而对照组为52例中的16例(P < 0.002)。TEG组接受血小板的患者为53例中的7例,而对照组为52例中的15例(P < 0.05)。TEG组患者接受的FFP量也更少(36±142 vs 217±463 mL;P < 0.04)。术后6、12或24小时纵隔引流管引流量无统计学差异。使用TEG进行即时凝血监测可减少术后输血量。我们得出结论,输血减少可能是由于这些患者止血得到改善,他们更早且特异性地识别了止血异常,从而接受了更合适的术中输血治疗。这些数据支持在复杂心脏手术的输血治疗方案中使用TEG。
在复杂心脏手术过程中,输注异体血制品很常见。在一项前瞻性随机试验中,我们将使用即时凝血检测的输血方案与常规实验室检测进行了比较,发现该方案在减少输血需求方面有效。