Mylin L M
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey 17033, USA.
J Immunol. 1999 Feb 15;162(4):2171-9.
SV40 large tumor Ag (Tag) contains four H-2b-restricted (I, II/III, IV, and V) CTL epitopes. A hierarchy exists among these CTL epitopes. CTL directed against epitopes I, II/III, and IV are readily detected following immunization of H-2b mice with SV40, Tag-transformed syngeneic cells, or a vaccinia recombinant that expresses full-length Tag, while epitope V-specific CTL are not. The mechanisms that define this hierarchy remain unknown. Initial studies have shown that the locations of epitopes I and V within SV40 Tag do not determine the immunological potencies of these epitopes. Like the wild-type Tag, derivatives in which the locations of epitopes I and V were precisely reversed within Tag failed to induce epitope V-specific CTL, but did induce epitope I-specific CTL. The use of an S206G-substituted epitope I variant (GAINNYAQKL) revealed that the S206G variant sequence induced CTL when located within the native epitope I context, but failed to do so when located within the epitope V context of Tag. Mutagenesis of residues adjacent to the S206G-substituted epitope I variant revealed that the identity of the residue flanking the amino terminus of the S206G variant was critical when it resided within the epitope V location, but not within the epitope I location. These results demonstrate that effects imposed by both regional context and adjacent residues can modulate immunogenicity, but that the relative importance of such effects varies in an epitope-dependent manner.
猴空泡病毒40大T抗原(Tag)含有四个H-2b限制性(I、II/III、IV和V)细胞毒性T淋巴细胞(CTL)表位。这些CTL表位之间存在等级关系。在用猴空泡病毒40、Tag转化的同基因细胞或表达全长Tag的痘苗重组体免疫H-2b小鼠后,可容易检测到针对表位I、II/III和IV的CTL,而针对表位V的特异性CTL则不然。定义这种等级关系的机制尚不清楚。初步研究表明,猴空泡病毒40 Tag内表位I和V的位置并不能决定这些表位的免疫效力。与野生型Tag一样,表位I和V的位置在Tag内精确颠倒的衍生物未能诱导表位V特异性CTL,但能诱导表位I特异性CTL。使用S206G取代的表位I变体(GAINNYAQKL)表明,S206G变体序列位于天然表位I背景中时可诱导CTL,但位于Tag的表位V背景中时则不能。对与S206G取代的表位I变体相邻的残基进行诱变表明,当S206G变体位于表位V位置而非表位I位置时,其氨基末端侧翼残基的身份至关重要。这些结果表明,区域背景和相邻残基施加的影响均可调节免疫原性,但这些影响的相对重要性因表位而异。