• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钙通道阻滞剂之争

The calcium channel blocker debate.

作者信息

Owens P, O'Brien E

出版信息

Ir Med J. 1998 Oct-Nov;91(5):158, 160-1.

PMID:9973747
Abstract

What, finally can we conclude from the work to date regarding the use of CCB's? The large clinical trials here give a number of clear messages to the prescriber. Short-acting dihydropyridine CCB's are unproven as prophylactic agents in ischaemic heart disease. In patients with poor left ventricular function post-infarct, CCB's are associated with an unchanged or increased mortality. Use of medications in the treatment of hypertension should be with proven first-line therapeutic agents; beta-blockers, diuretics; and the long-acting dihydropyridine CCB's nifedipine GITS and nitrendipine. The final argument in the discussion over the safety or otherwise of calcium channel blockers will rest in the completion in the future of a number of prospective, randomised, place-controlled clinical drug trials. These trials are currently ongoing, and their results may not be available until after the year 2000.

摘要

到目前为止,就使用钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)的研究工作,我们最终能得出什么结论呢?这里的大型临床试验给开处方的医生传达了一些明确的信息。短效二氢吡啶类CCB作为缺血性心脏病的预防药物尚未得到证实。在心肌梗死后左心室功能较差的患者中,CCB与死亡率不变或增加有关。治疗高血压应使用已证实的一线治疗药物;β受体阻滞剂、利尿剂;以及长效二氢吡啶类CCB硝苯地平控释片和尼群地平。关于钙通道阻滞剂安全性与否的讨论的最终论据将取决于未来一些前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照的临床药物试验的完成情况。这些试验目前正在进行,其结果可能要到2000年以后才会出来。

相似文献

1
The calcium channel blocker debate.钙通道阻滞剂之争
Ir Med J. 1998 Oct-Nov;91(5):158, 160-1.
2
Current status of safety and efficacy of calcium channel blockers in cardiovascular diseases: a critical analysis based on 100 studies.钙通道阻滞剂在心血管疾病中的安全性和有效性现状:基于100项研究的批判性分析
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2000 Sep-Oct;43(2):171-96. doi: 10.1053/pcad.2000.7010.
3
Calcium channel blockers in the dock: innocent or guilty?
J Hum Hypertens. 1996 May;10(5):277-80.
4
[Calcium antagonists in cardiovascular disease. Clinical evidence from morbidity and mortality trials].[心血管疾病中的钙拮抗剂。发病率和死亡率试验的临床证据]
Drugs. 2000;59 Spec No 2:25-37.
5
Atenolol as a comparator in outcome trials in hypertension: a correct choice in the past, but not for the future?阿替洛尔作为高血压预后试验的对照药物:过去的正确选择,但未来并非如此?
Blood Press. 2007;16(1):6-12. doi: 10.1080/08037050701246386.
6
Preoperative exposure to calcium channel blockers suggests increased blood product use following cardiac surgery.术前接触钙通道阻滞剂表明心脏手术后血液制品使用量增加。
J Miss State Med Assoc. 2000 Oct;41(10):752-6.
7
[Views on the use of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of heart ischemia and hypertension].[关于钙通道阻滞剂在治疗心脏缺血和高血压中的应用观点]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 1998 Sep;5(27):107-10.
8
The development of new-onset type 2 diabetes associated with choosing a calcium channel blocker compared to a diuretic or beta-blocker.与选择利尿剂或β受体阻滞剂相比,选择钙通道阻滞剂与新发2型糖尿病的发生有关。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1239-44. doi: 10.1185/030079907X188044. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
9
Sustained-release calcium channel antagonists in cardiovascular disease: pharmacology and current therapeutic use.
Eur Heart J. 1998 Aug;19 Suppl I:I8-14.
10
Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine.钙通道阻滞剂治疗轻至中度高血压:一日一次硝苯地平控释片与一日一次氨氯地平的多中心比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(3):226-37. doi: 10.1185/030079903125001677.