Suppr超能文献

学习使用物料搬运设备时的下背部压力。

Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.

作者信息

Chaffin D B, Stump B S, Nussbaum M A, Baker G

机构信息

Center for Ergonomics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 1999 Jan;42(1):94-110. doi: 10.1080/001401399185829.

Abstract

This study examines the potential effect of short-term practice on low-back stresses during manual lifting and lowering of a 15 kg load, and while using two different types of materials handling devices (MHDs) to lift and lower a 40 kg load. The two MHDs used were an articulated balance arm and a pneumatic hoist. The expectation was that low-back dynamic moments, EMG measured torso muscle antagonism, and EMG predicted L4/L5 disc compression forces would rapidly decrease with practice, and that the manual lift-lower activities would be learned faster than the MHD-assisted exertions. Four naïve male college age subjects performed 40 lift and lower exertions, both manually and with the two MHDs for a total of 24 experiments. Non-linear regressions of the peak and average low-back moments, EMGs and disc compression values revealed only small decreases in the values (from 2 to 14%) over the 40 trials, and it was only statistically significant for five of the 48 regressions. This would seem to indicate that if learning is present in these tasks it is going to be very slow learning, and thus future studies will need to include a much larger number of trials. The effects of MHDs on the learning rates when compared to manual lifting learning rates was not statistically significant. It was shown, however, that MHDs had a particularly beneficial effect on reducing L4/L5 compression forces during load lowering activities despite the MHD load being much heavier than the manual load. It also was found that the level of torso muscle co-contraction increased significantly (2-4 times) when MHD handling was involved compared to manual lifting and lowering.

摘要

本研究考察了短期练习对手动提起和放下15千克重物时以及使用两种不同类型的物料搬运设备(MHD)提起和放下40千克重物时下背部压力的潜在影响。所使用的两种MHD分别是铰接式平衡臂和气动葫芦。预期是随着练习,下背部动态力矩、肌电图测量的躯干肌肉拮抗作用以及肌电图预测的L4/L5椎间盘压缩力会迅速降低,并且手动提起-放下活动的学习速度会比MHD辅助的用力动作更快。四名未经过训练的男性大学生年龄受试者进行了40次提起和放下动作,包括手动以及使用两种MHD,总共进行了24次实验。对下背部力矩峰值和平均值、肌电图以及椎间盘压缩值进行的非线性回归显示,在40次试验中这些值仅略有下降(从2%到14%),并且在48次回归中只有5次具有统计学意义。这似乎表明,如果这些任务中存在学习现象,那也是非常缓慢的学习,因此未来的研究需要纳入更多次数的试验。与手动提起的学习速度相比,MHD对学习速度的影响没有统计学意义。然而,研究表明,尽管MHD搬运的负载比手动负载重得多,但MHD在负载放下活动期间对降低L4/L5压缩力具有特别有益的作用。还发现,与手动提起和放下相比,涉及MHD操作时躯干肌肉共同收缩水平显著提高(2至4倍)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验