• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习使用物料搬运设备时的下背部压力。

Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.

作者信息

Chaffin D B, Stump B S, Nussbaum M A, Baker G

机构信息

Center for Ergonomics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 1999 Jan;42(1):94-110. doi: 10.1080/001401399185829.

DOI:10.1080/001401399185829
PMID:9973874
Abstract

This study examines the potential effect of short-term practice on low-back stresses during manual lifting and lowering of a 15 kg load, and while using two different types of materials handling devices (MHDs) to lift and lower a 40 kg load. The two MHDs used were an articulated balance arm and a pneumatic hoist. The expectation was that low-back dynamic moments, EMG measured torso muscle antagonism, and EMG predicted L4/L5 disc compression forces would rapidly decrease with practice, and that the manual lift-lower activities would be learned faster than the MHD-assisted exertions. Four naïve male college age subjects performed 40 lift and lower exertions, both manually and with the two MHDs for a total of 24 experiments. Non-linear regressions of the peak and average low-back moments, EMGs and disc compression values revealed only small decreases in the values (from 2 to 14%) over the 40 trials, and it was only statistically significant for five of the 48 regressions. This would seem to indicate that if learning is present in these tasks it is going to be very slow learning, and thus future studies will need to include a much larger number of trials. The effects of MHDs on the learning rates when compared to manual lifting learning rates was not statistically significant. It was shown, however, that MHDs had a particularly beneficial effect on reducing L4/L5 compression forces during load lowering activities despite the MHD load being much heavier than the manual load. It also was found that the level of torso muscle co-contraction increased significantly (2-4 times) when MHD handling was involved compared to manual lifting and lowering.

摘要

本研究考察了短期练习对手动提起和放下15千克重物时以及使用两种不同类型的物料搬运设备(MHD)提起和放下40千克重物时下背部压力的潜在影响。所使用的两种MHD分别是铰接式平衡臂和气动葫芦。预期是随着练习,下背部动态力矩、肌电图测量的躯干肌肉拮抗作用以及肌电图预测的L4/L5椎间盘压缩力会迅速降低,并且手动提起-放下活动的学习速度会比MHD辅助的用力动作更快。四名未经过训练的男性大学生年龄受试者进行了40次提起和放下动作,包括手动以及使用两种MHD,总共进行了24次实验。对下背部力矩峰值和平均值、肌电图以及椎间盘压缩值进行的非线性回归显示,在40次试验中这些值仅略有下降(从2%到14%),并且在48次回归中只有5次具有统计学意义。这似乎表明,如果这些任务中存在学习现象,那也是非常缓慢的学习,因此未来的研究需要纳入更多次数的试验。与手动提起的学习速度相比,MHD对学习速度的影响没有统计学意义。然而,研究表明,尽管MHD搬运的负载比手动负载重得多,但MHD在负载放下活动期间对降低L4/L5压缩力具有特别有益的作用。还发现,与手动提起和放下相比,涉及MHD操作时躯干肌肉共同收缩水平显著提高(2至4倍)。

相似文献

1
Low-back stresses when learning to use a materials handling device.学习使用物料搬运设备时的下背部压力。
Ergonomics. 1999 Jan;42(1):94-110. doi: 10.1080/001401399185829.
2
The load on the lumbar spine during asymmetrical bi-manual materials handling.非对称双手搬运物料时腰椎所承受的负荷。
Ergonomics. 1992 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):783-805. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967363.
3
Biomechanically and electromyographically assessed load on the spine in self-paced and force-paced lifting work.在自主节奏和强制节奏的举重工作中,通过生物力学和肌电图评估脊柱所承受的负荷。
Ergonomics. 1992 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):881-8. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967368.
4
An electromyographic analysis of seated and standing lifting tasks.坐姿和站姿提举任务的肌电图分析
Ergonomics. 1992 Jul-Aug;35(7-8):889-98. doi: 10.1080/00140139208967369.
5
The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.身体上的助力提升装置对非对称自由式提升过程中腰部三维动态力矩和肌电图的影响。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Mar;23(3):372-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.012.
6
Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.足部定位指导、初始垂直负荷位置及提起技术:对下背部负荷的影响
Ergonomics. 2004 Oct 22;47(13):1365-85. doi: 10.1080/00140130410001714742.
7
Using sitting as a component of job rotation strategies: are lifting/lowering kinetics and kinematics altered following prolonged sitting.将坐姿作为工作轮换策略的一个组成部分:长时间坐着后,提举/放下动作的动力学和运动学是否会发生改变。
Appl Ergon. 2009 May;40(3):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
8
Load knowledge affects low-back loading and control of balance in lifting tasks.负载知识会影响搬运任务中的腰部负荷和平衡控制。
Ergonomics. 1997 May;40(5):559-75. doi: 10.1080/001401397188035.
9
The evaluation of a practical biomechanical model estimating lumbar moments in occupational activities.
Ergonomics. 1994 Sep;37(9):1495-502. doi: 10.1080/00140139408964929.
10
Biomechanical analysis of materials handling manipulators in short distance transfers of moderate mass objects: joint strength, spine forces and muscular antagonism.
Ergonomics. 1999 Dec;42(12):1597-618. doi: 10.1080/001401399184703.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the weight configuration of hand load on trunk musculature during static weight holding.静态持重过程中手部负荷重量配置对躯干肌肉组织的影响。
Ergonomics. 2018 Jun;61(6):831-838. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1387675. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
2
The Effect of a Mechanical Arm System on Portable Grinder Vibration Emissions.机械臂系统对便携式磨床振动排放的影响。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Apr;60(3):371-86. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev084. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.等长推挤过程中的下背部生物力学与静态稳定性
Hum Factors. 2005 Fall;47(3):536-49. doi: 10.1518/001872005774859962.
4
Active trunk stiffness increases with co-contraction.主动躯干僵硬度随共同收缩而增加。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Feb;16(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.006. Epub 2005 Aug 15.