Koritzer R T
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1976 Nov;45(3 pt. 2):673-85. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330450334.
Trace elements in the dental enamel of 43 prehistoric Indians from Illinois, Maryland and Virginia show concentration differences by age, sex and geographical locality. Sample areas on an incisor or first molar were blocked off with paraffin, washed twice with distilled water and etched 7 times with 6N HCl. An optical emission spectrophotometer was used to analyze the 9 samples, representing surface contamination and sequential enamel layers. Al, B, Ba, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Si, Sr, and Ti were present in most samples in micro or trace quantities; other elements were detected with less regularity. Comparisons of the 2 water washes with the 3 superficial, 4 deep and 7 total acid etches, suggest that during burial the residual inorganic portion of the enamel exchanged little or nothing with the soil. Enamel from archeological teeth may therefore be utilized in host factor studies in dental paleopathology. The Jy 50 Illinois Indians differ from the Potomac Creek, Virginia, Indians both in quantities of elements present and in internal sample variability. In each group, the sexes differ in 4 or more elements, both as to content and variability. Similarly, the older half of each sample differs from the younger. Patterns of sex and age difference are irregular, suggesting cultural differences, rather than physiological, in utilizing the environment during enamel-forming years. Enamel composition, as affected by differential environment utilization, may partially explain sex, age and geographical differences in dental pathology rates.
来自伊利诺伊州、马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州的43名史前印第安人的牙釉质中的微量元素显示出年龄、性别和地理位置上的浓度差异。用石蜡封闭切牙或第一磨牙上的样本区域,用蒸馏水冲洗两次,并用6N盐酸蚀刻7次。使用发射光谱分光光度计分析这9个样本,它们代表了表面污染物和连续的牙釉质层。大多数样本中存在微量或痕量的铝、硼、钡、铜、铁、钾、镁、锰、钠、硅、锶和钛;其他元素的检测规律性较差。对两次水洗样本与三次表面酸蚀、四次深度酸蚀和七次总酸蚀样本的比较表明,在埋葬过程中,牙釉质中残留的无机部分与土壤的交换很少或几乎没有。因此,考古牙齿的牙釉质可用于牙齿古病理学中的宿主因素研究。伊利诺伊州的Jy 50印第安人与弗吉尼亚州波托马克溪的印第安人在元素含量和样本内部变异性方面都有所不同。在每组中,男女在4种或更多元素的含量和变异性方面都存在差异。同样,每个样本中年龄较大的一半与年龄较小的一半也有所不同。性别和年龄差异模式不规则,这表明在牙釉质形成期利用环境方面存在文化差异,而非生理差异。受不同环境利用影响的牙釉质成分可能部分解释了牙齿病理学发病率中的性别、年龄和地理差异。