Choi B B, Steckel J, Denoto G, Vaughan E D, Schlegel P N
James Buchanan Brady Foundation, Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, USA.
J Urol. 1999 Mar;161(3):840-3.
The number of radical retropubic prostatectomies performed in the United States has increased during the last decade. There are 5 to 10% of candidates for radical retropubic prostatectomy who have a detectable inguinal hernia on physical examination. Furthermore, recent data suggest that there is an increased incidence of inguinal hernia after radical retropubic prostatectomy. We evaluated the role of simultaneous inguinal hernioplasty during radical prostatectomy.
During 575 radical prostatectomy procedures from June 1991 to June 1997, 70 hernioplasties were performed in 48 patients. Retrospective chart review was performed for all men who underwent simultaneous hernia repair. Mean patient age was 60.9 years (range 43 to 73). Polypropylene or polyester fiber prostheses were used for mesh hernioplasty. All repairs were performed using a preperitoneal approach during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
There were 35 hernioplasties performed without and 35 with mesh. Mean postoperative followup was 24 months (range 6 to 66). Of the hernias 71% were indirect and 29% were direct. No recurrence was detected after mesh hernioplasty, whereas 5 hernias (14%) recurred in the nonmesh group. In this group 2 men (4%) also had de novo hernias on the contralateral side during followup. All recurrent hernias were diagnosed within 1 year of the initial operation. No patient had wound infection, persistent neuralgia or ischemic orchitis.
Simultaneous repair of inguinal hernias during radical retropubic prostatectomy is effective and technically feasible. There is convenient access to the preperitoneal space during radical retropubic prostatectomy and hernia repair adds only 5 to 10 minutes of operative time. Mesh repair appears to offer optimized results compared to the nonmesh technique. Despite the use of prosthetic material, no complications were attributable to its application during these genitourinary procedures.
在过去十年中,美国耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的实施数量有所增加。体格检查发现有可检测到的腹股沟疝的耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术候选者占5%至10%。此外,最近的数据表明,耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后腹股沟疝的发病率有所上升。我们评估了在根治性前列腺切除术中同时进行腹股沟疝修补术的作用。
在1991年6月至1997年6月期间进行的575例根治性前列腺切除术手术中,48例患者进行了70次疝修补术。对所有同时进行疝修补的男性患者进行回顾性病历审查。患者平均年龄为60.9岁(范围43至73岁)。聚丙烯或聚酯纤维假体用于网状疝修补术。所有修补术均在耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术期间采用腹膜前入路进行。
35例未使用补片进行疝修补术,35例使用补片。术后平均随访24个月(范围6至66个月)。其中71%的疝为间接疝,29%为直接疝。网状疝修补术后未发现复发,而非网状组有5例疝(14%)复发。在该组中,2名男性(4%)在随访期间对侧也出现了新发疝。所有复发性疝均在初次手术后1年内被诊断出。没有患者发生伤口感染、持续性神经痛或缺血性睾丸炎。
耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术期间同时修复腹股沟疝是有效的,并且在技术上是可行的。在耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术期间可以方便地进入腹膜前间隙,疝修补术仅增加5至1十、1十、手术时间。与非网状技术相比,网状修补术似乎能提供更优的结果。尽管使用了假体材料,但在这些泌尿生殖系统手术中,没有并发症可归因于其应用。