Powell I J, Banerjee M, Sakr W, Grignon D, Wood D P, Novallo M, Pontes E
Department of Urology, Harper Hospital, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Cancer. 1999 Jan 15;85(2):472-7.
There have recently been challenges to testing high risk populations, i.e., African-American men younger than 50 years, for prostate carcinoma (PCa). The mortality rate of patients with PCa between ages 40 and 60 years is nearly 3 times greater among African-American men (AAM) compared with white men (WM). The literature in support of testing AAM at an earlier age than WM is sparse. Therefore, the authors present clinical and histologic data that support the testing of AAM at a younger age, utilizing data on patients with clinically localized PCa.
Examination of consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens from AAM and WM was performed from January 1991 to June 1996 among AAM and WM at Wayne State University, Harper Hospital, Detroit, Michigan. International, salvage prostatectomy, and neoadjuvant hormonal therapy patients were excluded, as were patients with lymph node metastasis. The authors examined biochemical recurrences of PCa in this cohort of men treated from January 1991 through December 1995. Univariate analysis of contingency tables was performed, using chi-squared-tests to assess the correlation between stage and race after stratification of patients by age group. Biochemical recurrence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test.
The authors examined radical prostatectomy specimens from 759 patients and biochemical recurrence outcome of 655 patients. AAM patients ages 50-69 years had higher prostate specific antigen levels, worse Gleason scores, more advanced stages of disease, and a higher recurrence rate. However, among men ages 70-79 years, there was no difference in these parameters between AAM and WM. Among men ages 40-49 years, a larger sample size is necessary to make meaningful comparisons.
Data on the outcomes of men treated for clinically localized PCa demonstrated more advanced disease and more frequent recurrence among young AAM than among WM, young and of advanced age. These differences in disease severity and recurrence, in addition to the disproportionate mortality among young AAM, are strong evidence that AAM should be tested for PCa at an earlier age than WM.
近期对高危人群(即年龄小于50岁的非裔美国男性)进行前列腺癌(PCa)检测面临挑战。40至60岁的PCa患者中,非裔美国男性(AAM)的死亡率几乎是白人男性(WM)的3倍。支持AAM比WM更早进行检测的文献稀少。因此,作者利用临床局限性PCa患者的数据,呈现支持AAM在更年轻时进行检测的临床和组织学数据。
1991年1月至1996年6月期间,在密歇根州底特律市韦恩州立大学哈珀医院,对AAM和WM的连续根治性前列腺切除术标本进行检查。排除国际患者、挽救性前列腺切除术患者、新辅助激素治疗患者以及有淋巴结转移的患者。作者检查了1991年1月至1995年12月期间接受治疗的这组男性中PCa的生化复发情况。通过卡方检验对列联表进行单因素分析,以评估按年龄组分层后的患者分期与种族之间的相关性。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和对数秩检验分析生化复发情况。
作者检查了759例患者的根治性前列腺切除术标本以及655例患者的生化复发结果。50至69岁的AAM患者前列腺特异性抗原水平更高,Gleason评分更差,疾病分期更晚,复发率更高。然而,在70至79岁的男性中,AAM和WM在这些参数上没有差异。在40至49岁的男性中,需要更大的样本量才能进行有意义的比较。
临床局限性PCa治疗男性患者的结果数据表明,年轻的AAM比年轻和老年的WM疾病进展更严重,复发更频繁。除了年轻AAM中不成比例的死亡率外,这些疾病严重程度和复发的差异有力地证明,AAM应比WM更早进行PCa检测。