Pinkstaff J K, Detterich J, Lynch G, Gall C
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-1275, USA.
J Neurosci. 1999 Mar 1;19(5):1541-56. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01541.1999.
Integrins are a diverse family of heterodimeric (alphabeta) adhesion receptors recently shown to be concentrated within synapses and involved in the consolidation of long-term potentiation. Whether neuronal types or anatomical systems in the adult rat brain are coded by integrin type was studied in the present experiments by mapping the relative densities of mRNAs for nine alpha and four beta subunits. Expression patterns were markedly different and in some regions complementary. General results and areas of notable labeling were as follows: alpha1-limited neuronal expression, neocortical layer V, hippocampal CA3; alpha3 and alpha5-diffuse neuronal and glial labeling, Purkinje cells, hippocampal stratum pyramidale, locus coeruleus (alpha3); alpha4- discrete limbic regions, olfactory cortical layer II, hippocampal CA2; alpha6-most prominently neuronal, neocortical subplate, endopiriform, subiculum; alpha7-discrete, all neocortical layers, hippocampal granule cells and CA3, cerebellar granule and Purkinje cells, all efferent cranial nerve nuclei; alpha8-discrete neuronal, deep cortex, hippocampal CA1, basolateral amygdala, striatum; alphaV-all cortical layers, striatum, Purkinje cells; beta4-dentate gyrus granule cells; beta5-broadly distributed, neocortex, medial amygdala, cerebellar granule and Purkinje cells, efferent cranial nerve nuclei; alpha2, beta2, and beta3-mRNAs not detected. These results establish that brain subfields express different balances of integrin subunits and thus different integrin receptors. Such variations will determine which matrix proteins are recognized by neurons and the types of intraneuronal signaling generated by matrix binding. They also could generate important differences in synaptic plasticity across brain systems.
整合素是一类多样的异二聚体(αβ)黏附受体,最近研究表明其在突触内聚集,并参与长期增强作用的巩固。在本实验中,通过绘制9种α亚基和4种β亚基的mRNA相对密度图,研究了成年大鼠脑中神经元类型或解剖系统是否由整合素类型编码。表达模式明显不同,在某些区域呈互补性。一般结果和显著标记区域如下:α1——神经元表达受限,新皮层第V层、海马CA3区;α3和α5——神经元和胶质细胞弥漫性标记,浦肯野细胞、海马锥体层、蓝斑(α3);α4——离散的边缘区域,嗅觉皮层第II层、海马CA2区;α6——最主要为神经元表达,新皮层下板层、内梨状核、下托;α7——离散分布,所有新皮层层、海马颗粒细胞和CA3区、小脑颗粒细胞和浦肯野细胞、所有传出脑神经核;α8——离散的神经元表达,深层皮层、海马CA1区、基底外侧杏仁核、纹状体;αV——所有皮层层、纹状体、浦肯野细胞;β4——齿状回颗粒细胞;β5——广泛分布,新皮层、内侧杏仁核、小脑颗粒细胞和浦肯野细胞、传出脑神经核;未检测到α2、β2和β3的mRNA。这些结果表明,脑亚区表达不同平衡的整合素亚基,从而表达不同的整合素受体。这种差异将决定神经元识别哪些基质蛋白以及基质结合产生的细胞内信号传导类型。它们还可能在不同脑系统的突触可塑性方面产生重要差异。