Barthe N, Basse-Cathalinat B, Meunier P J, Ribot C, Marchandise X, Sabatier J P, Braillon P, Thevenot J, Sutter B
Hôpital Pellegrin Tripode, Bordeaux, France.
Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(4):379-84. doi: 10.1007/s001980050078.
The relative influence of genetic and environmental determinants on bone mass is still unclear. Using an original multicentric mode of recruitment, based on absorptiometry current practice, the hypothesis of a familial predisposition to low bone mineral content was assessed. The study was based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of lumbar and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), using daughters of women with a low BMD (case mothers). These BMD values were compared with those of control daughters of women with a normal BMD. Case mothers (n = 72) aged 54.3 +/- 4.8 years were recruited on the basis of a questionnaire and a vertebral Z-score < -2 SD. Their healthy daughters of more than 20 years (n = 77) aged 28.2 +/- 4.9 years had their vertebral and femoral BMD Z-score determined. The control groups were composed of mothers aged 54.1 +/- 4.7 years, paired by age +/- 2 years to the case mothers, and of their daughters of more than 20 years old, aged 27.7 +/- 5.8 years. For daughters, a significant difference was found between the mean vertebral Z-scores (-0.82 +/- 1.08 for cases and 0.01 +/- 1.14 for controls, p < 0.0001). The difference was in the same direction but was not statistically significant for mean femoral Z-scores (-0.58 +/- 1.15 for cases and -0.22 +/- 1.33 for controls, p < 0.073). These findings confirm the hypothesis of a familial predisposition to low BMD.
遗传和环境因素对骨量的相对影响仍不明确。基于当前骨密度测定实践,采用一种原始的多中心招募模式,对低骨矿物质含量的家族易感性假说进行了评估。该研究基于对腰椎和股骨颈骨矿物质密度(BMD)的双能X线吸收测定(DXA)测量,研究对象为骨密度低的女性(病例母亲)的女儿。将这些骨密度值与骨密度正常的女性的对照女儿的骨密度值进行比较。病例母亲(n = 72)年龄为54.3±4.8岁,通过问卷调查和椎体Z评分< -2 SD进行招募。她们年龄超过20岁的健康女儿(n = 77)年龄为28.2±4.9岁,测定其椎体和股骨骨密度Z评分。对照组由年龄为54.1±4.7岁、与病例母亲年龄相差±2岁的母亲及其年龄超过20岁、年龄为27.7±5.8岁的女儿组成。对于女儿们,椎体平均Z评分之间存在显著差异(病例组为-0.82±1.08,对照组为0.01±1.14,p<0.0001)。股骨平均Z评分的差异方向相同,但无统计学意义(病例组为-0.58±1.15,对照组为-0.22±1.33,p<0.073)。这些发现证实了低骨密度家族易感性的假说。