Youmans K R, Hunt G B
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia.
Vet Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;28(1):38-47. doi: 10.1053/jvet.1999.0038.
To determine the most effective and reliable method for progressive attenuation of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs.
The effects of the four treatments on femoral vein diameter and histology were compared with controls.
Fourteen healthy adult dogs.
Twenty-eight canine femoral veins were subjected to sham surgery (4), partial attenuation using silk (5), cellophane banding (6), ameroid constrictor implantation (5), and intravascular thrombogenic coils (8). Changes in vein diameter were evaluated at weekly intervals using venography. After 6 weeks, the dogs were humanely euthanatized, and histopathology was performed on the femoral veins.
Only cellophane and ameroid constrictors produced progressive and permanent vein attenuation. Ameroid constrictors produced complete occlusion within 14 days in four of five veins and by 21 days in the fifth vein. Cellophane banding produced slow progressive (but not complete) attenuation in five of six veins. Complete occlusion was demonstrated in four of eight veins after thrombogenic coil implantation; however, recanalization occurred in all but one dog. Perivascular silk did not produce significant progressive attenuation.
Ameroid constrictors produced rapid occlusion of femoral veins. Cellophane banding resulted in slower attenuation. Thrombogenic coils produced attenuation, but this was not sustained in many cases. Silk did not promote ongoing attenuation.
Both ameroid constrictor implantation and cellophane banding show promise for progressive attenuation of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs. Because rapid occlusion was seen with ameroid constrictors, however, cellophane banding maybe a safer technique in animals with increased hepatic vascular resistance. Further evaluation of both treatments in clinical cases is warranted.
确定犬单发性肝外门体分流渐进性衰减的最有效、可靠方法。
将四种治疗方法对股静脉直径和组织学的影响与对照组进行比较。
14只健康成年犬。
28条犬的股静脉接受假手术(4条)、丝线部分衰减(5条)、玻璃纸绑扎(6条)、阿美氏环缩窄器植入(5条)和血管内血栓形成线圈(8条)处理。每周通过静脉造影评估静脉直径变化。6周后,对犬实施安乐死,并对股静脉进行组织病理学检查。
只有玻璃纸和阿美氏环缩窄器能产生渐进性和永久性静脉衰减。阿美氏环缩窄器在5条静脉中的4条在14天内完全闭塞,第5条静脉在21天内完全闭塞。玻璃纸绑扎在6条静脉中的5条产生缓慢渐进性(但非完全性)衰减。血栓形成线圈植入后,8条静脉中的4条出现完全闭塞;然而,除1只犬外,其余犬均出现再通。血管周围丝线未产生明显的渐进性衰减。
阿美氏环缩窄器能使股静脉迅速闭塞。玻璃纸绑扎导致衰减较慢。血栓形成线圈可产生衰减,但在许多情况下不能持续。丝线不能促进持续衰减。
阿美氏环缩窄器植入和玻璃纸绑扎对犬单发性肝外门体分流的渐进性衰减均显示出前景。然而,由于阿美氏环缩窄器可导致快速闭塞,对于肝血管阻力增加的动物,玻璃纸绑扎可能是一种更安全的技术。有必要在临床病例中对这两种治疗方法进行进一步评估。