Suppr超能文献

犬三种不同的单肝外门体分流减流技术(部分结扎、完全结扎和放置阿梅罗德缩窄环)后的围手术期结果

Perioperative outcomes after three different single extrahepatic portosystemic shunt attenuation techniques in dogs: partial ligation, complete ligation and ameroid constrictor placement.

作者信息

Hurn S D, Edwards G A

机构信息

Melbourne Veterinary Referral Centre, 70 Blackbum Road, Glen Waverley, Victoria 3150.

出版信息

Aust Vet J. 2003 Nov;81(11):666-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb12532.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunt occlusion by complete and partial silk ligation and ameroid constrictor placement in dogs.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of 30 dogs with single congenital extrahepatic shunts.

PROCEDURE

Records between 1990 and 2000 were reviewed. Patient age, breed, weight, presenting clinical signs, clinical pathology results, diagnostic imaging results, the surgery procedure performed, implant used, time taken, intra operative complications and perioperative complications were recorded. Mortality rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty dogs had a silk ligation procedure, 10 partially occluded and 10 completely. Ten dogs had an ameroid constrictor placement procedure. Ameroid constrictor surgery was significantly shorter in duration than silk ligation. Time for silk ligation was 91.8 +/- 35.2 minutes (median 90.0); time for ameroid constrictor placement was 71.5 +/- 12.0 (median 72.5, P = 0.049). A reduction in intraoperative complications was also noted in the ameroid constrictor surgery group.

CONCLUSION

The ameroid constrictor offered a surgical occlusion procedure of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in dogs that was clinically as effective as silk ligation in the perioperative period, with a significantly shorter surgery time.

摘要

目的

比较在犬类中通过完全和部分丝线结扎以及使用阿梅罗德缩窄器进行单发性肝外门体分流闭塞术的围手术期结果。

设计

对30只患有单发性先天性肝外分流的犬进行回顾性分析。

程序

回顾1990年至2000年期间的记录。记录患者年龄、品种、体重、呈现的临床症状、临床病理结果、诊断成像结果、所进行的手术程序、使用的植入物、所用时间、术中并发症和围手术期并发症。计算死亡率。

结果

20只犬接受了丝线结扎手术,其中10只进行部分闭塞,10只进行完全闭塞。10只犬接受了阿梅罗德缩窄器放置手术。阿梅罗德缩窄器手术的持续时间明显短于丝线结扎手术。丝线结扎的时间为91.8±35.2分钟(中位数90.0);阿梅罗德缩窄器放置的时间为71.5±12.0(中位数72.5,P = 0.049)。在阿梅罗德缩窄器手术组中还注意到术中并发症有所减少。

结论

阿梅罗德缩窄器为犬类单发性肝外门体分流提供了一种手术闭塞程序,在围手术期临床效果与丝线结扎相同,但手术时间明显更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验