• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯布赖代的急性阑尾炎

Acute appendicitis in Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Thomas J O

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.

出版信息

Cent Afr J Med. 1998 Jul;44(7):176-8.

PMID:10028192
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical diagnosis with the histopathological diagnosis; to highlight associated histological lesions and; to determine whether these provide additional useful information for management.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Pathology Department of the King Fahd Specialist Hospital in Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.

SUBJECTS

370 appendicectomy specimen reviewed within a 12 month period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of acute or chronic appendicitis.

RESULTS

Acute appendicitis was found to be most common between ages 10 to 29 years (74.0%). The diagnostic accuracy was 81%. A higher rate of appendices without histological sign of inflammation was found in females. Incidental appendicectomy was commonly associated with cholecystectomy. Unsuspected but treatable parasitic and protozoal infections were detected in 3% of appendices.

CONCLUSION

Routine examination of all appendicectomy specimens cannot be overemphasized, as unsuspected but treatable parasitic on protozoal infections may be detected.

摘要

目的

比较临床诊断与组织病理学诊断;突出相关的组织学病变;并确定这些病变是否为治疗提供额外的有用信息。

设计

病例系列研究。

地点

沙特阿拉伯布赖代法赫德国王专科医院病理科。

研究对象

在12个月期间内对370份阑尾切除标本进行回顾性研究。

主要观察指标

急性或慢性阑尾炎临床诊断的准确性。

结果

发现急性阑尾炎在10至29岁人群中最为常见(74.0%)。诊断准确率为81%。女性中无组织学炎症迹象的阑尾比例较高。意外阑尾切除术通常与胆囊切除术相关。在3%的阑尾中检测到未被怀疑但可治疗的寄生虫和原生动物感染。

结论

必须高度重视对所有阑尾切除标本进行常规检查,因为可能会检测到未被怀疑但可治疗的寄生虫或原生动物感染。

相似文献

1
Acute appendicitis in Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯布赖代的急性阑尾炎
Cent Afr J Med. 1998 Jul;44(7):176-8.
2
Management of patients with equivocal signs of appendicitis.阑尾炎体征不明确患者的管理。
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1997 Apr;42(2):85-8.
3
Acute appendicitis in Lagos: a review of 250 cases.拉各斯的急性阑尾炎:250例病例回顾
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2009 Dec;16(4):268-73.
4
Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendicectomy rate.阑尾炎的诊断准确性和穿孔率:与患者年龄、性别及阑尾切除术率的关联
Eur J Surg. 1992 Jan;158(1):37-41.
5
[Acute appendicitis at the National University Hospital in Bangui, Central African Republic: epidemiologic, clinical, paraclinical and therapeutic aspects].[中非共和国班吉国立大学医院的急性阑尾炎:流行病学、临床、辅助检查及治疗方面]
Sante. 2001 Apr-Jun;11(2):117-25.
6
The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens.阑尾切除标本常规组织病理学检查的价值。
BMC Surg. 2007 Aug 10;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-7-17.
7
Validity of leukocyte count to predict the severity of acute appendicitis.白细胞计数预测急性阑尾炎严重程度的有效性。
Saudi Med J. 2005 Dec;26(12):1945-7.
8
Emergency general surgical admissions. Prospective institutional experience in non-traumatic acute abdomen: implications for education, training and service.急诊普通外科入院。非创伤性急腹症的前瞻性机构经验:对教育、培训和服务的启示
Saudi Med J. 2006 Nov;27(11):1674-9.
9
Appendicitis in pre-school children: a continuing clinical challenge. A retrospective study.学龄前儿童阑尾炎:一项持续存在的临床挑战。一项回顾性研究。
Int J Surg. 2008 Oct;6(5):371-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.06.003. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.疑似急性阑尾炎手术患者炎症标志物的诊断准确性:受试者工作特征曲线分析
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jul;165(7):679-85. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189744.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical, Radiological and Pathological Appraisal of Acute Appendicitis in Al Qassim, Saudi Arabia: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.沙特阿拉伯卡西姆急性阑尾炎的临床、放射学和病理学评估:单中心回顾性分析
Cureus. 2022 Aug 31;14(8):e28627. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28627. eCollection 2022 Aug.