Hersh D, Mulgrew C L, Van Kirk J, Kranzler H R
Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Feb;67(1):37-42. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.1.37.
To evaluate the validity of 2 self-report methods for estimating cocaine use, Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) and weekly calendar reports from 65 patients with a cocaine use disorder were compared with urine drug test results. The TLFB showed fair to moderate validity, and the weekly calendar showed moderate to high validity in measuring the frequency of cocaine use. Similar results were obtained when the self-report measures were used to time specific cocaine use episodes. In addition to evidence for superiority of the weekly calendar, the validity of self-reports was inversely related to the percentage of positive urine test results. Furthermore, there was some evidence that validity increased as the time window over which the comparisons were drawn increased. Given the central role of self-reports in the clinical and research evaluation of drug use, factors affecting their validity warrant further investigation.
为评估两种自我报告方法用于估计可卡因使用情况的有效性,对65名可卡因使用障碍患者的时间线追溯法(TLFB)和每周日历报告与尿液药物检测结果进行了比较。TLFB显示出中等至较好的有效性,每周日历报告在测量可卡因使用频率方面显示出中等至高有效性。当使用自我报告措施来确定特定可卡因使用事件的时间时,也获得了类似结果。除了有证据表明每周日历报告更具优势外,自我报告的有效性与尿液检测阳性结果的百分比呈负相关。此外,有一些证据表明,随着用于比较的时间窗口增加,有效性也会提高。鉴于自我报告在药物使用的临床和研究评估中的核心作用,影响其有效性的因素值得进一步研究。