Ehrman R N, Robbins S J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6178.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Aug;62(4):843-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.62.4.843.
Fifty-nine persons addicted to heroin and maintained by methadone reported on daily heroin and cocaine use during 2 timeline calendar interviews administered 6 weeks apart. Retrospective reports covering 6 months were compared with urine samples taken weekly during the interval. Test-retest correlations were high and timeline estimates of drug use frequency were significantly correlated with the frequency of drug-positive urine results. Thus, timeline reports of drug-use frequency appeared both reliable and valid. Individual participants either over- or under-reported by an average of about 15%, and they did not identify instances of drug use with greater than chance accuracy when particular episodes of drug use occurred. These results support the use of timeline reports to make group comparisons of long-term drug use, but suggest that timeline data should not be used to identify specific drug-use episodes. Work with other drug-use population is necessary to extend these conclusions.
59名对海洛因成瘾且靠美沙酮维持治疗的人在两次相隔6周进行的时间线日历访谈中报告了每日海洛因和可卡因使用情况。将涵盖6个月的回顾性报告与在此期间每周采集的尿液样本进行比较。重测相关性很高,药物使用频率的时间线估计与药物阳性尿液结果的频率显著相关。因此,药物使用频率的时间线报告似乎既可靠又有效。个体参与者的报告平均高估或低估约15%,并且当发生特定药物使用事件时,他们识别药物使用情况的准确率并不高于随机水平。这些结果支持使用时间线报告进行长期药物使用的组间比较,但表明时间线数据不应被用于识别特定的药物使用事件。有必要对其他药物使用人群开展研究以推广这些结论。