Spoth R, Goldberg C, Redmond C
Institute for Social and Behavioral Research, Iowa State University, Ames 50010, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Feb;67(1):157-63. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.1.157.
This study examined whether family risk factors predicted attrition in a prevention research project that incorporated procedures to increase retention in assessment and intervention activities. Analyses used data from 667 rural families collected over 4 waves and consisted of (a) young adolescent and parent reports of internalizing and externalizing problems, (b) observer ratings of distress in parent-child interactions, and (c) family socioeconomic status (SES). Analyses failed to identify any risk factors as significant predictors of intervention participation. Only SES was found to be significant as a predictor of assessment attrition. This SES result appeared to reflect an association between lower educational attainment and an increased likelihood of attrition.
本研究考察了在一个采用增加评估和干预活动留存率程序的预防研究项目中，家庭风险因素是否能预测失访情况。分析使用了来自667个农村家庭、历经4轮收集的数据，这些数据包括：（a）青少年和家长关于内化问题和外化问题的报告；（b）观察者对亲子互动中苦恼程度的评分；以及（c）家庭社会经济地位（SES）。分析未能确定任何风险因素是干预参与情况的显著预测指标。仅发现社会经济地位是评估失访情况的显著预测指标。这一社会经济地位的结果似乎反映了较低教育程度与失访可能性增加之间的关联。
