• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决育儿项目实施过程中的招募与留用障碍:城乡地区有效项目交付的经验教训。

Addressing Barriers to Recruitment and Retention in the Implementation of Parenting Programs: Lessons Learned for Effective Program Delivery in Rural and Urban Areas.

作者信息

Smokowski Paul, Corona Rosalie, Bacallao Martica, Fortson Beverly L, Marshall Khiya J, Yaros Anna

机构信息

School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Sep;27(9):2925-2942. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1139-8. Epub 2018 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10826-018-1139-8
PMID:30100698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6084790/
Abstract

Research has demonstrated the effectiveness of family-based programs for reducing adolescent risk behaviors and promoting adolescent health; however, parent engagement, specifically in terms of recruitment and retention, remains a consistent challenge. Recruitment rates for family-based prevention programs range from 3 to 35%, while, on average, 28% of caregivers drop out before program completion. Thus, engagement of parents in prevention programming is of utmost concern to ensure families and youth benefit from implementation of family-based programs. In this manuscript, two Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded projects share their experiences with engagement of parents in violence prevention programs. Problems related to parent engagement are reviewed, as are structural, attitudinal, and interpersonal barriers specific to recruitment and retention. Examples of successful implementation strategies identified across urban and rural sites are also analyzed and lessons learned are provided.

摘要

研究表明,以家庭为基础的项目在减少青少年危险行为和促进青少年健康方面具有有效性;然而,家长参与,特别是在招募和留住家长方面,仍然是一个持续存在的挑战。以家庭为基础的预防项目的招募率在3%至35%之间,而平均有28%的照顾者在项目完成前退出。因此,确保家长参与预防项目对于保证家庭和青少年从以家庭为基础的项目实施中受益至关重要。在本手稿中,两个由疾病控制与预防中心资助的项目分享了他们在让家长参与预防暴力项目方面的经验。文中回顾了与家长参与相关的问题,以及招募和留住家长所特有的结构、态度和人际障碍。还分析了在城市和农村地区确定的成功实施策略的实例,并提供了经验教训。

相似文献

1
Addressing Barriers to Recruitment and Retention in the Implementation of Parenting Programs: Lessons Learned for Effective Program Delivery in Rural and Urban Areas.解决育儿项目实施过程中的招募与留用障碍:城乡地区有效项目交付的经验教训。
J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Sep;27(9):2925-2942. doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1139-8. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
2
Supporting Expectant and Parenting Teens: New Evidence to Inform Future Programming and Research.支持孕妇和育儿青少年:为未来的规划和研究提供新证据。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Sep;24(Suppl 2):67-75. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02996-2.
3
A Hybrid Digital Parenting Program Delivered Within the Malaysian Preschool System: Protocol for a Feasibility Study of a Small-Scale Factorial Cluster Randomized Trial.一种在马来西亚学前系统内提供的混合式数字化亲职教育计划:一项小规模因子簇随机试验的可行性研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 26;13:e55491. doi: 10.2196/55491.
4
Understanding family motivations and barriers to participation in community-based programs for overweight youth: one program model does not fit all.了解超重青少年参与社区项目的家庭动机和障碍:一个项目模式并不适合所有人。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825ceaf9.
5
What Is Not in the Methods Section: Challenges, Successes, and Lessons Learned From Conducting School-Based Interpersonal Violence Prevention Research.方法部分未涉及的内容:在开展基于学校的人际暴力预防研究方面的挑战、成功经验和教训。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):4507-4532. doi: 10.1177/08862605221109881. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
6
Promising Parenting Programs for Reducing Adolescent Problem Behaviors.减少青少年问题行为的有前景的育儿项目。
J Child Serv. 2013;8(4). doi: 10.1108/JCS-04-2013-0016.
7
Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'Families for Health', a family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention delivered in a community setting for ages 6 to 11 years.一项随机对照试验,评估“健康家庭”项目的有效性和成本效益。该项目是一种针对6至11岁儿童的基于家庭的社区肥胖治疗干预措施。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(1):1-180. doi: 10.3310/hta21010.
8
Constructing "Packages" of Evidence-Based Programs to Prevent Youth Violence: Processes and Illustrative Examples From the CDC's Youth Violence Prevention Centers.构建预防青少年暴力的循证项目“套餐”:来自美国疾病控制与预防中心青少年暴力预防中心的流程及示例
J Prim Prev. 2016 Apr;37(2):141-63. doi: 10.1007/s10935-016-0423-x.
9
Engaging pregnant and parenting teens: early challenges and lessons learned from the Evaluation of Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Approaches.让怀孕和育儿的青少年参与进来:从青少年怀孕预防方法评估中获得的早期挑战和经验教训。
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Mar;54(3 Suppl):S84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.019.
10
An intervention for parents with severe personality difficulties whose children have mental health problems: a feasibility RCT.一项针对有严重人格障碍且其子女有心理健康问题的父母的干预措施:一项可行性 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.

引用本文的文献

1
The ROOTS Parenting Intervention to Improve Child Emotional and Physical Health: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial for Black and Latiné Families.改善儿童情绪和身体健康的根源育儿干预措施:针对黑人及拉丁裔家庭的试点随机对照试验方案
J Marital Fam Ther. 2025 Jul;51(3):e70052. doi: 10.1111/jmft.70052.
2
Where Did You Hear About Us?: Examining How Referral Sources Impact Recruitment and Retention Within a Behavioral Parent Training Program.您是从哪里听说我们的?:探究转介来源如何影响行为家长培训项目中的招募与留存情况。
J Community Psychol. 2025 Jul;53(5):e70019. doi: 10.1002/jcop.70019.
3
A Non-coercive Prevention Cascade Using a Cash-Plus Model for Legally Involved Youth: a Multi-method Study of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Engagement Outcomes.一种针对涉法青年采用现金加模式的非强制性预防级联:可行性、可接受性和参与结果的多方法研究
Prev Sci. 2025 Feb;26(2):282-292. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01785-z. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Fostering Digital Life Skills Through Social Media With Adolescents in 6 German States: Protocol for an Accessibility Study According to the RE-AIM Framework.在德国6个州通过社交媒体培养青少年的数字生活技能:一项基于RE-AIM框架的可及性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 17;13:e51085. doi: 10.2196/51085.
5
Swimming Against the Current: Addressing Community Needs and Establishing Partnerships for the Prevention of Opioid and Methamphetamine use Among Parents.逆流而上:解决社区需求并建立伙伴关系,以预防父母使用阿片类药物和甲基苯丙胺。
Prev Sci. 2024 Jan;25(1):193-198. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01602-5. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
6
A Literature Review of Digital Behavioral Parent Training Programs for Parents of Adolescents.青少年父母数字化行为家长培训项目的文献综述
Prev Sci. 2024 Jan;25(1):155-174. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01596-0. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
7
Multiple Perspectives on Motivating Parents in Pediatric Primary Care to Initiate Participation in Parenting Programs.激励儿科初级保健中家长参与育儿项目的多角度观点。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Apr;24(3):469-476. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.07.020. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
8
"There's more love between us": The parental experience of attending Mellow Babies, a targeted, early intervention program for parents and their babies.“我们之间有更多的爱”:父母参加 Mellow Babies 的体验,这是一个针对父母及其婴儿的早期干预计划。
Infant Ment Health J. 2023 Jan;44(1):100-116. doi: 10.1002/imhj.22029. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
9
Preventing Adverse Childhood Experiences: The Role of Etiological, Evaluation, and Implementation Research.预防不良儿童经历:病因学、评估和实施研究的作用。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Jun;62(6 Suppl 1):S6-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.10.024.
10
Online-Delivered Over Staff-Delivered Parenting Intervention for Young Children With Disruptive Behavior Problems: Cost-Minimization Analysis.针对有破坏性行为问题幼儿的在线育儿干预与工作人员实施的育儿干预:成本最小化分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Mar 11;5(1):e30795. doi: 10.2196/30795.

本文引用的文献

1
Parenting Wisely Six Months Later: How Implementation Delivery Impacts Program Effects at Follow-Up.六个月后的明智育儿:实施交付如何影响随访时的项目效果。
J Prim Prev. 2018 Apr;39(2):129-153. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0495-2.
2
Predictors of Group Leaders' Perceptions of Parents' Initial and Dynamic Engagement in a Family Preventive Intervention.预测群体领导者对父母在家庭预防干预中初始和动态参与的看法的因素。
Prev Sci. 2018 Jul;19(5):609-619. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0781-5.
3
Engagement in Behavioral Parent Training: Review of the Literature and Implications for Practice.参与行为父母培训:文献综述及实践启示
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;19(3):204-15. doi: 10.1007/s10567-016-0205-2.
4
Engaging Urban Parents of Early Adolescents in Parenting Interventions: Home Visits vs. Group Sessions.让城市中青春期早期孩子的家长参与育儿干预:家访与小组会议。
Sch Comm J. 2014 Fall-Winter;24(2):63-82.
5
Meeting the complex needs of urban youth and their families through the 4Rs 2Ss Family Strengthening Program: The "real world" meets evidence-informed care.通过4R 2S家庭强化项目满足城市青年及其家庭的复杂需求:“现实世界”与循证护理相遇。
Res Soc Work Pract. 2015 Jul 1;25(4):433-45. doi: 10.1177/1049731514537900. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
6
Engaging youth and families in school mental health services.让青少年及其家庭参与学校心理健康服务。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2015 Apr;24(2):385-98. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
7
Is parenting the mediator of change in behavioral parent training for externalizing problems of youth?养育子女是否是青少年外化问题行为父母培训中变化的中介因素?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Dec;34(8):608-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
8
Change in participant engagement during a family-based preventive intervention: ups and downs with time and tension.基于家庭的预防性干预期间参与者参与度的变化:随时间和紧张程度的起伏
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Dec;28(6):811-20. doi: 10.1037/fam0000036. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
9
Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors.家庭检查的依从性对育儿方式变化和幼儿问题行为的间接影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):962-74. doi: 10.1037/a0033950. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
10
Caregiver responsiveness to the family bereavement program: what predicts responsiveness? What does responsiveness predict?照顾者对家庭丧亲计划的反应:哪些因素可以预测反应?反应又可以预测什么?
Prev Sci. 2013 Dec;14(6):545-56. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0337-7.