Suppr超能文献

谷物食品的脂肪含量:传统提取技术与最新开发提取技术的比较

Fat contents of cereal foods: comparison of classical with recently developed extraction techniques.

作者信息

Zou W, Lusk C, Messer D, Lane R

机构信息

University of Alabama, Department of Human Nutrition, Tuscaloosa 35487-0158, USA.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 1999 Jan-Feb;82(1):141-50.

Abstract

Eight cereal products ranging from a fat-free ready-to-eat (RTE) cereal (frosted flakes) to a full-fat high-ratio cake mix were subjected to analyte separation by anhydrous diethyl ether extraction (EE), acid hydrolysis/mixed ether extraction (AH), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) with CO2 and with CO2 modified with 15% ethanol (SFEmod). Gravimetric analyses of extracts indicated higher (P < or = 0.05) crude fat values by AH than by EE, SFE, or SFEmod. Extractions followed by fatty acid methyl ester analysis also produced higher (P < or = 0.05) triglyceride means by AH than by other methods used for heat-treated RTE cereals and for ready-to-cook (RTC) cream of wheat. Therefore, for labeling purposes, AH seems most appropriate because in most cases it achieves higher triglyceride values than extraction with solvent(s) alone. SFE and SPE, on the other hand, yield fat values similar to those obtained by EE and offer the advantages of reduced solvent volume, short extraction times, and ease of laboratory automation.

摘要

八种谷物产品,从无脂即食谷物( Frosted Flakes )到全脂高比例蛋糕预拌粉,分别采用无水乙醚萃取( EE )、酸水解 / 混合醚萃取( AH )、固相萃取( SPE )以及用二氧化碳和用 15% 乙醇改性的二氧化碳进行超临界流体萃取( SFE )( SFEmod )来进行分析物分离。提取物的重量分析表明,通过 AH 法得到的粗脂肪值高于( P≤0.05 ) EE 、 SFE 或 SFEmod 法。萃取后进行脂肪酸甲酯分析时,对于经过热处理的即食谷物和即煮型小麦糊,通过 AH 法得到的甘油三酯平均值也高于( P≤0.05 )其他方法。因此,出于标签标注目的, AH 法似乎最为合适,因为在大多数情况下,它所得到的甘油三酯值高于仅用溶剂萃取的方法。另一方面, SFE 和 SPE 得到的脂肪值与 EE 法相似,并且具有溶剂用量减少、萃取时间短以及便于实验室自动化操作等优点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验