Suppr超能文献

超临界流体萃取后肉类及肉制品中脂肪含量和脂肪酸组成的测定

Determination of fat content and fatty acid composition in meat and meat products after supercritical fluid extraction.

作者信息

Berg Hans, Dahlberg Lena, Mathiasson Lennart

机构信息

Swedish Meats R&D, Kävlinge, Sweden.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2002 Sep-Oct;85(5):1064-9.

Abstract

Two different relatively simple, commercially available supercritical fluid extractors (SFE), Leco and Foss-Tecator, were tested for the determination of total fat content in meat and meat products. The fatty acid composition in meat and meat products was also determined after the Foss-Tecator extraction in an aliquot of the extract. Total fat was determined by weighing after the different extraction procedures and the fatty acid composition by gas chromatography after hydrolysis and methylation of the extract. The results for total fat content agreed well with results from a standard method of Schmid, Bondzynski, and Ratzlaff, which uses conventional solvent extraction. Fatty acid composition was compared with the Bligh and Dyer extraction, and showed good agreement. The average relative difference between SFE and Bligh and Dyer of all fatty acids in the sample was <3% for acids exceeding 0.5% of total fatty acid amount. The advantages of SFE over traditional methods are a much lower consumption of hazardous organic solvents and shorter extraction times. To obtain quantitative recoveries by SFE, ethanol was added to the extraction cells before extraction.

摘要

对两种不同的、相对简单的市售超临界流体萃取器(SFE),即Leco和Foss-Tecator,进行了测试,以测定肉类和肉制品中的总脂肪含量。在Foss-Tecator萃取后的提取物等分试样中,还测定了肉类和肉制品中的脂肪酸组成。通过不同萃取程序后的称重测定总脂肪,通过提取物水解和甲基化后的气相色谱法测定脂肪酸组成。总脂肪含量的结果与Schmid、Bondzynski和Ratzlaff的标准方法(使用传统溶剂萃取)的结果吻合良好。将脂肪酸组成与Bligh和Dyer萃取法进行比较,结果显示吻合良好。对于占总脂肪酸量超过0.5%的酸,样品中所有脂肪酸的SFE与Bligh和Dyer之间的平均相对差异<3%。SFE相对于传统方法的优点是危险有机溶剂的消耗量低得多,萃取时间短得多。为了通过SFE获得定量回收率,在萃取前向萃取池中加入乙醇。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验