Suppr超能文献

[The physician in the dilemma between confidentiality and mandatory reporting of occupational diseases].

作者信息

Blome O

机构信息

Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften e.V., Sankt Augustin.

出版信息

Pneumologie. 1998 Dec;52(12):680-3.

Abstract

If a physician may reasonably suspect an occupational disease after examining his or her patient he is liable by German law to report this directly to the statutory accident insurance body or the Government institution responsible for the medical safety of working places, in accordance with section 202 of the Federal German social legislation code VII. This legal obligation to officially report an occupational disease is based on weighing the pros and cons in respect of balancing out an individual's right to privacy on the one hand and the (in this case predominant) public safety interests on the other. Legislation does not provide for the individual to effectively object to such reporting and hence the physician is obliged to report even if the patient objects. When doing so the physician does not violate his legal obligation to observe medical professional secrecy as defined according to section 203 German Penal Code by section 4 of the German professional medical code.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验