Naylor M D, Brooten D, Campbell R, Jacobsen B S, Mezey M D, Pauly M V, Schwartz J S
School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):613-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.7.613.
Comprehensive discharge planning by advanced practice nurses has demonstrated short-term reductions in readmissions of elderly patients, but the benefits of more intensive follow-up of hospitalized elders at risk for poor outcomes after discharge has not been studied.
To examine the effectiveness of an advanced practice nurse-centered discharge planning and home follow-up intervention for elders at risk for hospital readmissions.
Randomized clinical trial with follow-up at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks after index hospital discharge.
Two urban, academically affiliated hospitals in Philadelphia, Pa.
Eligible patients were 65 years or older, hospitalized between August 1992 and March 1996, and had 1 of several medical and surgical reasons for admission.
Intervention group patients received a comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up protocol designed specifically for elders at risk for poor outcomes after discharge and implemented by advanced practice nurses.
Readmissions, time to first readmission, acute care visits after discharge, costs, functional status, depression, and patient satisfaction.
A total of 363 patients (186 in the control group and 177 in the intervention group) were enrolled in the study; 70% of intervention and 74% of control subjects completed the trial. Mean age of sample was 75 years; 50% were men and 45% were black. By week 24 after the index hospital discharge, control group patients were more likely than intervention group patients to be readmitted at least once (37.1 % vs 20.3 %; P<.001). Fewer intervention group patients had multiple readmissions (6.2% vs 14.5%; P = .01) and the intervention group had fewer hospital days per patient (1.53 vs 4.09 days; P<.001). Time to first readmission was increased in the intervention group (P<.001). At 24 weeks after discharge, total Medicare reimbursements for health services were about $1.2 million in the control group vs about $0.6 million in the intervention group (P<.001). There were no significant group differences in post-discharge acute care visits, functional status, depression, or patient satisfaction.
An advanced practice nurse-centered discharge planning and home care intervention for at-risk hospitalized elders reduced readmissions, lengthened the time between discharge and readmission, and decreased the costs of providing health care. Thus, the intervention demonstrated great potential in promoting positive outcomes for hospitalized elders at high risk for rehospitalization while reducing costs.
高级执业护士进行的综合出院计划已显示可短期降低老年患者的再入院率,但对于出院后有不良结局风险的住院老年人进行更密集随访的益处尚未得到研究。
探讨以高级执业护士为中心的出院计划和家庭随访干预对有再次入院风险的老年人的有效性。
在首次出院后2、6、12和24周进行随访的随机临床试验。
宾夕法尼亚州费城的两家城市学术附属医院。
符合条件的患者年龄在65岁及以上,于1992年8月至1996年3月期间住院,因多种医疗和手术原因之一入院。
干预组患者接受了专门为出院后有不良结局风险的老年人设计的综合出院计划和家庭随访方案,由高级执业护士实施。
再入院率、首次再入院时间、出院后的急性护理就诊次数、费用、功能状态、抑郁情况和患者满意度。
共有363名患者(对照组186名,干预组177名)纳入研究;干预组70%的受试者和对照组74%的受试者完成了试验。样本的平均年龄为75岁;50%为男性,45%为黑人。在首次出院后24周时,对照组患者比干预组患者更有可能至少再次入院一次(37.1%对20.3%;P<0.001)。干预组再次入院多次的患者较少(6.2%对14.5%;P = 0.01),且干预组每位患者的住院天数较少(1.53天对4.09天;P<0.001)。干预组首次再入院的时间延长(P<0.001)。出院24周时,对照组医疗保险对医疗服务的报销总额约为120万美元,而干预组约为60万美元(P<0.001)。出院后的急性护理就诊次数、功能状态、抑郁情况或患者满意度在两组之间没有显著差异。
以高级执业护士为中心的出院计划和家庭护理干预,可降低有风险的住院老年人的再入院率,延长出院与再入院之间的时间,并降低提供医疗保健的成本。因此,该干预措施在促进高再入院风险的住院老年人取得积极结局的同时降低成本方面显示出巨大潜力。