Boggan Joel C, Sankineni Spoorthi, Dennis Paul A, Chen Dazhe, Sledge Tina Wong, Halpern David, Rushton Sharron, Williams John W, Der Tatyana, Tabriz Amir Alishahi, Gordon Adelaide M, Jacobs Morgan, Boucher Nathan A, Colandrea Maria, Alexopoulos Anastasia-Stefania, Roman Jones Joanne, Leflore-Lloyd Nina, Cantrell Sarah, Goldstein Karen M, Gierisch Jennifer M
Hospital Medicine Section, Medical Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, and Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (J.C.B.).
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, and Duke Primary Care, Durham, North Carolina (S.S., D.H.).
Ann Intern Med. 2025 Feb;178(2):229-240. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-01140. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
Postdischarge contacts (PDCs) after hospitalization are common practice, but their effectiveness in reducing use of acute care after discharge remains unclear.
To assess the effects of PDC on 30-day emergency department (ED) visits, 30-day hospital readmissions, and patient satisfaction.
MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL searched from 2012 to 25 May 2023.
Randomized and nonrandomized trials of PDC within 7 days.
Two investigators independently screened articles and assessed risk of bias (ROB). Single reviewers extracted data, with verification by second investigators. Random-effects meta-analyses were done on outcomes shared by at least 3 studies, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework.
Of 13 included studies (11 randomized trials [RTs]), 12 delivered PDCs via telephone. Three of 11 RTs were rated as having low ROB, with 1 rated high. Most PDC interventions ( = 10) consisted of single telephone contacts, often within 3 days. Eight studies focused on patients identified as higher-risk by the authors. There were no differences in 30-day ED use (5 RTs; 3054 patients; risk difference, 0.00 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03]; moderate certainty) or 30-day hospital readmissions (7 RTs; 7075 patients; risk difference, 0.00 [CI, -0.02 to 0.02]; moderate certainty) with PDC.
Adherence and fidelity to PDC interventions were poorly described, and only 1 study investigated nontelephone PDC.
Postdischarge contacts within 7 days of discharge were not associated with reductions in 30-day ED use or readmissions compared with usual care. Health systems should reconsider the utility of universal PDCs because multifaceted interventions targeting higher-risk patients may be necessary to reduce use of acute care after discharge.
Department of Veterans Affairs. (PROSPERO: CRD42023465675).
出院后随访(PDC)是常见的做法,但其在减少出院后急性护理使用方面的有效性仍不明确。
评估出院后随访对30天内急诊就诊、30天内再次入院以及患者满意度的影响。
检索2012年至2023年5月25日的MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL。
7天内出院后随访的随机和非随机试验。
两名研究人员独立筛选文章并评估偏倚风险(ROB)。由单一评审员提取数据,并由第二名研究人员进行核实。对至少3项研究共有的结局进行随机效应荟萃分析,并使用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定和评价)框架评估证据的确定性。
在纳入的13项研究(11项随机试验[RTs])中,12项通过电话进行出院后随访。11项随机试验中有3项被评为低偏倚风险,1项被评为高偏倚风险。大多数出院后随访干预措施(n = 10)包括单次电话联系,通常在3天内。8项研究关注作者确定为高风险的患者。出院后随访在30天内急诊使用(5项随机试验;3054例患者;风险差异,0.00[95%CI,-0.02至0.03];中等确定性)或30天内再次入院(7项随机试验;7075例患者;风险差异,0.00[CI,-0.02至0.02];中等确定性)方面没有差异。
对出院后随访干预措施的依从性和保真度描述不佳,且只有1项研究调查了非电话出院后随访。
与常规护理相比,出院后7天内的随访与30天内急诊使用或再次入院的减少无关。卫生系统应重新考虑普遍出院后随访的效用,因为可能需要针对高风险患者的多方面干预措施来减少出院后急性护理的使用。
退伍军人事务部。(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:CRD42023465675)