Suppr超能文献

出院后增强营养的膳食:一项试点随机对照试验的结果

Meals Enhancing Nutrition After Discharge: Findings from a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Buys David R, Campbell Anthony D, Godfryd Alice, Flood Kellie, Kitchin Elizabeth, Kilgore Meredith L, Allocca Sally, Locher Julie L

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):599-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.005. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

After older adults experience episodes of poor health or are hospitalized, they may not return to premorbid or prehospitalization eating behaviors. Furthermore, poor nutrition increases hospital readmission risk, but evidence-based interventions addressing these risks are limited.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study's objective was to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial assessing a post-discharge home-delivered meal program's impact on older adults' nutritional intake and hospital readmissions and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program. The aims of the study were to evaluate successful recruitment, randomization, and retention of at least 80% of the 24 participants sought; to compare the outcomes of hospital readmission and total daily caloric intake between participants in the intervention and control groups; and to assess patient acceptability and satisfaction with the program.

DESIGN

This study used a two-arm randomized controlled trial design, and baseline data were collected at enrollment; three 24-hour food recalls were collected during the intervention period; and health services utilization and intervention satisfaction was evaluated 45 days post-discharge.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Twenty-four patients from the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital's Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Unit were enrolled from May 2014 to June 2015. They were 65 years or older; at risk for malnutrition; cognitively intact; able to communicate; discharged to a place where the patient or family was responsible for preparing meals; and diagnosed with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia. Final analysis included 21 participants.

INTERVENTION

The intervention group received 10 days of home-delivered meals and nutrition education; the control group received usual care and nutrition education.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was intervention feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention goals. Hospital readmissions, caloric intake, and satisfaction with the intervention were also evaluated.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED

Univariate and bivariate parametric statistics were used to evaluate differences between groups. Goals for success were identified to assess feasibility of conducting a full-scale study and outcomes were measured against the goals.

RESULTS

Of the randomized participants, 87.5% were retained for final data collection, indicating that this intervention study is feasible. There were no significant differences between groups for hospital readmissions; however, caloric intake during the intervention period was greater for intervention vs control participants (1,595 vs 1,235; P=0.03). Participants were overwhelmingly satisfied (82% to 100% satisfied or very satisfied) with staff performance, meal quality, and delivery processes.

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes of providing home-delivered meals to older adults after hospital discharge in partnership with a small nonprofit organization is feasible and warrants future research.

摘要

背景

老年人经历健康状况不佳或住院后,可能无法恢复到病前或住院前的饮食行为。此外,营养不良会增加再次入院的风险,但针对这些风险的循证干预措施有限。

目的

这项试点研究的目的是评估开展一项随机对照试验的可行性,该试验旨在评估出院后上门送餐计划对老年人营养摄入和再次入院情况的影响,并评估患者对该计划的接受度和满意度。该研究的目标是评估成功招募、随机分组并留住至少80%(共24名)目标参与者;比较干预组和对照组参与者的再次入院情况及每日总热量摄入结果;评估患者对该计划的接受度和满意度。

设计

本研究采用双臂随机对照试验设计,在入组时收集基线数据;在干预期间收集三次24小时饮食回顾;在出院后45天评估医疗服务利用情况和干预满意度。

参与者/研究地点:2014年5月至2015年6月,从阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校医院的老年急性护理(ACE)病房招募了24名患者。他们年龄在65岁及以上;有营养不良风险;认知功能正常;能够交流;出院后回到由患者或家人负责准备膳食的地方;并被诊断患有充血性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、急性心肌梗死或肺炎。最终分析纳入了21名参与者。

干预措施

干预组接受10天的上门送餐和营养教育;对照组接受常规护理和营养教育。

主要结局指标

主要结局是干预的可行性,通过招募和留住参与者的目标来衡量。还评估了再次入院情况、热量摄入以及对干预的满意度。

所进行的统计分析

采用单变量和双变量参数统计来评估组间差异。确定成功目标以评估开展全面研究的可行性,并根据目标衡量结果。

结果

在随机分组的参与者中,87.5%被留住以进行最终数据收集,表明这项干预研究是可行的。两组在再次入院方面没有显著差异;然而,干预组在干预期间的热量摄入高于对照组(1595千卡对1235千卡;P = 0.03)。参与者对工作人员表现、膳食质量和送餐流程的满意度极高(82%至100%满意或非常满意)。

结论

与一个小型非营利组织合作开展一项随机对照试验,以评估出院后为老年人提供上门送餐的效果是可行的,值得未来进一步研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing.能量平衡测量:聊胜于无。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul;39(7):1109-13. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.199. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验