Neal J G, Jackson E M, Cox M J, Thacker J G, Edlich R F
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, USA.
J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 Spring;48(1):24-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(1999)48:1<24::aid-jbm5>3.0.co;2-y.
Holes in latex gloves can be reliably detected by commercially available electronic devices. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of an electronic glove hole detection device using latex gloves to that of neoprene, vinyl, and nitrile latex-free gloves. The electronic hole detection device accurately detected holes in the latex gloves during the 2-h study. In contrast, the latex-free gloves were immediately conductive of electricity in the absence of holes. Consequently, electronic glove hole detection devices cannot be reliably used with latex-free gloves.
市售电子设备能够可靠地检测出乳胶手套上的破洞。本研究的目的是比较一款使用乳胶手套的电子手套破洞检测设备与氯丁橡胶、乙烯基和腈类无乳胶手套的性能。在为期2小时的研究中,电子破洞检测设备准确地检测出了乳胶手套上的破洞。相比之下,无乳胶手套在没有破洞的情况下会立即导电。因此,电子手套破洞检测设备不能可靠地用于无乳胶手套。