Fujita H, Iida H, Kawanabe K, Okada Y, Oka M, Masuda T, Kitamura Y, Nakamura T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 Spring;48(1):43-51. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(1999)48:1<43::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-n.
We have developed a bioactive bone cement consisting of MgO-CaO-SiO2-P2O5-CaF2 glass-ceramic powder (AW glass-ceramic powder), silica glass powder as an inorganic filler, and bisphenol-a-glycidyl methacrylate (bis-GMA) based resin as an organic matrix. The efficacy of this bioactive bone cement was investigated by evaluating its pressurization in a 5-mm hole and small pores using a simulated acetabular cavity. Two types of acetabular components were used (flanged and unflanged sockets) and a commercially available polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement (CMW 1 Radiopaque Bone Cement) was selected as a comparative control. Bioactive bone cement exerted greater intrusion volume in 5-mm holes than PMMA bone cement in both the flanged and unflanged sockets 10 minutes after pressurization (p < 0.05). In the small pores the bioactive and PMMA bone cements exerted almost identical intrusion volumes in flanged and unflanged sockets 10 min after pressurization. The intrusion volume in the flanged socket 10 minutes after pressurization was greater than that in the unflanged socket in all groups (p < 0.05). These results show that bioactive bone cement intrudes deeper into anchor holes than PMMA bone cement.
