• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险调整后的按人头付费:为荷兰情况制定诊断成本组分类

Risk-adjusted capitation payments: developing a diagnostic cost groups classification for the Dutch situation.

作者信息

Lamers L M

机构信息

Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 1998 Jul;45(1):15-32. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00031-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00031-1
PMID:10183010
Abstract

In many countries market-oriented health care reforms are high on the political agenda. A common element of these reforms is that the consumers may choose among competing health insurers or health plans, which are largely financed through premium-replacing capitation payments. Since 1993, Dutch sickness funds receive risk-adjusted capitation payments based on demographic factors. It has been shown that the predictive accuracy of a demographic capitation model improves when it is extended with diagnostic information from prior hospitalizations, in the form of Diagnostic Costs Groups (DCGs). In this study a DCG classification is developed using Dutch cost data of sickness fund members of all ages. The study also dealt with the question of how to handle high discretion diagnoses. For the Dutch situation high discretion diagnoses may be defined as those diagnoses for which day case treatment is a possible alternative for a hospital admission. Grouping persons with a hospital admission for high discretion diagnoses together with people without an admission resulted in a slight reduction of the predictive accuracy of the DCG model. Adequate risk-adjustment is critical to the success of market-oriented health care reforms. The use of diagnostic information from prior hospitalizations seems a promising option for improving the capitation formula.

摘要

在许多国家,以市场为导向的医疗保健改革在政治议程中占据重要位置。这些改革的一个共同要素是,消费者可以在相互竞争的健康保险公司或健康计划中进行选择,这些保险公司或健康计划主要通过保费替代人头费来融资。自1993年以来,荷兰的疾病基金根据人口统计因素获得风险调整后的人头费支付。研究表明,当人口统计人头费模型通过先前住院的诊断信息(以诊断成本组(DCG)的形式)进行扩展时,其预测准确性会提高。在本研究中,利用荷兰所有年龄段疾病基金成员的成本数据开发了一种DCG分类。该研究还处理了如何处理高自由度诊断的问题。对于荷兰的情况,高自由度诊断可定义为那些日间病例治疗可替代住院治疗的诊断。将因高自由度诊断而住院的人与未住院的人归为一组,会导致DCG模型的预测准确性略有下降。充分的风险调整对于以市场为导向的医疗保健改革的成功至关重要。利用先前住院的诊断信息似乎是改进人头费公式的一个有前景的选择。

相似文献

1
Risk-adjusted capitation payments: developing a diagnostic cost groups classification for the Dutch situation.风险调整后的按人头付费:为荷兰情况制定诊断成本组分类
Health Policy. 1998 Jul;45(1):15-32. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(98)00031-1.
2
Risk-adjusted capitation based on the Diagnostic Cost Group Model: an empirical evaluation with health survey information.基于诊断成本组模型的风险调整后按人头付费:一项基于健康调查信息的实证评估
Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;33(6):1727-44.
3
Multiyear diagnostic information from prior hospitalization as a risk-adjuster for capitation payments.将既往住院的多年诊断信息作为按人头付费的风险调整因素。
Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):549-61. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00005.
4
Pharmacy costs groups: a risk-adjuster for capitation payments based on the use of prescribed drugs.药房成本分组:一种基于处方药使用情况的人头费支付风险调整器。
Med Care. 1999 Aug;37(8):824-30. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199908000-00012.
5
Capitation payments based on prior hospitalizations.基于既往住院情况的按人头付费。
Health Econ. 1993 Jul;2(2):177-88. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020210.
6
Risk adjusted premium subsidies and risk sharing: key elements of the competitive sickness fund market in the Netherlands.风险调整后的保费补贴与风险分担:荷兰竞争性疾病基金市场的关键要素
Health Policy. 2003 Jul;65(1):49-62. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00116-1.
7
Risk-adjusted capitation: recent experiences in The Netherlands.风险调整后的按人头付费:荷兰的近期经验
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Winter;13(5):120-36. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.5.120.
8
The high costs of death: should health plans get higher payments when members die?死亡的高昂成本:成员死亡时,健康保险计划是否应获得更高赔付?
Med Care. 1998 Oct;36(10):1451-60. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199810000-00003.
9
Health-based risk adjustment: is inpatient and outpatient diagnostic information sufficient?基于健康的风险调整:住院和门诊诊断信息是否足够?
Inquiry. 2001;38(4):423-31. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.4.423.
10
Risk-adjusted capitation payments for catastrophic risks based on multi-year prior costs.基于多年既往成本的灾难性风险的风险调整后按人头付费。
Health Policy. 1997 Feb;39(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(96)00862-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A Framework for the Design of Risk-Adjustment Models in Health care Provider Payment Systems.医疗服务提供者支付系统中风险调整模型设计框架
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Feb;82(1):43-57. doi: 10.1177/10775587241273355. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Improving diagnosis-based cost groups in the Dutch risk equalization model: the effects of a new clustering method and allowing for multimorbidity.改进荷兰风险均等化模型中的基于诊断的费用分组:一种新聚类方法和允许多病共存的影响。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Jun;23(2):303-324. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09345-0. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
3
'Optimising PharmacoTherapy In the multimorbid elderly in primary CAre' (OPTICA) to improve medication appropriateness: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial.
优化初级保健中老年多病患者的药物治疗(OPTICA)以提高药物适宜性:一项群组随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e031080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031080.
4
A Review on Methods of Risk Adjustment and their Use in Integrated Healthcare Systems.风险调整方法及其在综合医疗系统中的应用综述
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 26;16(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2500.
5
Improving risk equalization using information on physiotherapy diagnoses.利用物理治疗诊断信息改进风险均衡
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;19(2):203-211. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0874-x. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
Can universal access and competition in long-term care insurance be combined?长期护理保险中的普遍可及性与竞争能否相结合?
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Jun;15(2):185-213. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9163-3. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
7
The Comparison of Matching Methods Using Different Measures of Balance: Benefits and Risks Exemplified within a Study to Evaluate the Effects of German Disease Management Programs on Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.使用不同平衡指标的匹配方法比较:在一项评估德国疾病管理项目对2型糖尿病患者长期结局影响的研究中的益处与风险示例
Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct;51(5):1960-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12452. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
Overpaying morbidity adjusters in risk equalization models.在风险均等模型中过度支付发病率调整因子。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;17(7):885-95. doi: 10.1007/s10198-015-0729-2. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
9
Identifying patients with chronic conditions using pharmacy data in Switzerland: an updated mapping approach to the classification of medications.利用瑞士的药房数据识别慢性病患者:一种更新的药物分类映射方法。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Oct 30;13:1030. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1030.
10
Cost sharing and decreased branded oral anti-diabetic medication adherence among elderly Part D Medicare beneficiaries.老年医疗保险计划 D 受益人中自付费用增加和品牌口服抗糖尿病药物依从性降低。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):876-85. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2342-3. Epub 2013 Feb 13.