Juhnke Christin, Bethge Susanne, Mühlbacher Axel C
IGM Institute Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
IGM Institute Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany; Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Oct 26;16(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2500.
Effective risk adjustment is an aspect that is more and more given weight on the background of competitive health insurance systems and vital healthcare systems. The objective of this review was to obtain an overview of existing models of risk adjustment as well as on crucial weights in risk adjustment. Moreover, the predictive performance of selected methods in international healthcare systems should be analysed.
A comprehensive, systematic literature review on methods of risk adjustment was conducted in terms of an encompassing, interdisciplinary examination of the related disciplines.
In general, several distinctions can be made: in terms of risk horizons, in terms of risk factors or in terms of the combination of indicators included. Within these, another differentiation by three levels seems reasonable: methods based on mortality risks, methods based on morbidity risks as well as those based on information on (self-reported) health status.
After the final examination of different methods of risk adjustment it was shown that the methodology used to adjust risks varies. The models differ greatly in terms of their included morbidity indicators. The findings of this review can be used in the evaluation of integrated healthcare delivery systems and can be integrated into quality- and patient-oriented reimbursement of care providers in the design of healthcare contracts.
在竞争性医疗保险体系和重要医疗体系的背景下,有效的风险调整越来越受到重视。本综述的目的是概述现有的风险调整模型以及风险调整中的关键权重。此外,还应分析所选方法在国际医疗体系中的预测性能。
针对风险调整方法进行了全面、系统的文献综述,涉及相关学科的广泛、跨学科研究。
一般来说,可以做出几种区分:在风险范围方面、在风险因素方面或在所纳入指标的组合方面。在这些方面,按三个层次进行另一种区分似乎是合理的:基于死亡风险的方法、基于发病风险的方法以及基于(自我报告的)健康状况信息的方法。
在对不同风险调整方法进行最终审查后发现,用于调整风险的方法各不相同。这些模型在所纳入的发病指标方面差异很大。本综述的结果可用于评估综合医疗服务体系,并可在设计医疗合同过程中纳入以质量和患者为导向的医疗服务提供者报销机制。