• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国七家屠宰厂牛肉胴体微生物污染的来源及程度

Sources and extent of microbiological contamination of beef carcasses in seven United States slaughtering plants.

作者信息

Sofos J N, Kochevar S L, Bellinger G R, Buege D R, Hancock D D, Ingham S C, Morgan J B, Reagan J O, Smith G C

机构信息

Center for Red Meat Safety, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 1999 Feb;62(2):140-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.2.140.

DOI:10.4315/0362-028x-62.2.140
PMID:10030632
Abstract

This study determined microbiological loads of beef carcasses at different stages during the slaughtering to chilling process in seven (four steer/heifer and three cow/bull) plants. Potential sources of contamination (feces, air, lymph nodes) were also tested. Each facility was visited twice, once in November through January (wet season) and again in May through June (dry season). Carcasses were sampled by aseptic excision of surface tissue (100 cm2) from the brisket, flank, and rump (30 samples each) after hide removal (pre-evisceration), after final carcass washing, and after 24-h carcass chilling. The samples were analyzed individually by standard procedures for aerobic plate counts (APC), total coliform counts (TCC), Escherichia coli biotype I counts (ECC), and presence of Salmonella. Incidence of Salmonella was higher on dry feces of older compared to younger animals, fresh feces of younger compared to older animals, and on cow/bull carcasses compared to steer/heifer carcasses. Most factors and their interactions had significant (P < or = 0.05) effects on the bacterial counts obtained. Depending on plant and season, APC, TCC, and ECC were < or =10(4), < or =10(2), and < or =10(1) CFU/cm2 in 46.7 to 93.3, 50.0 to 100.0, and 74.7 to 100.0% of the samples, respectively. TCC exceeded 10(3) CFU/cm2 in 2.5% (wet season) and 1.5% (dry season) of the samples. ECC exceeded 10(2) CFU/cm2 in 8.7%, 0.3%, and 1.5% of the pre-evisceration, final carcass-washing, and 24-h carcass-chilling samples, respectively, during the wet season; the corresponding numbers during the dry season were 3.5%, 2.2%, and 3.0%, respectively. These data should serve as a baseline for future comparisons in measuring the microbiological status of beef carcasses, as the new inspection requirements are implemented.

摘要

本研究测定了七家屠宰场(四家屠宰阉牛/小母牛的厂和三家屠宰母牛/公牛的厂)中,牛胴体在屠宰至冷却过程不同阶段的微生物负荷。还对潜在污染源(粪便、空气、淋巴结)进行了检测。每家工厂都进行了两次走访,一次是在11月至1月(雨季),另一次是在5月至6月(旱季)。在去除牛皮后(去内脏前)、胴体最终清洗后以及胴体冷却24小时后,通过无菌切除胸部、侧腹和臀部的表面组织(100平方厘米)对胴体进行采样(每个部位30个样本)。通过标准程序分别对样本进行需氧平板计数(APC)、总大肠菌群计数(TCC)、I型大肠杆菌计数(ECC)以及沙门氏菌检测。与年幼动物相比,年长动物干粪便上的沙门氏菌发生率更高;与年长动物相比,年幼动物新鲜粪便上的沙门氏菌发生率更高;与阉牛/小母牛胴体相比,母牛/公牛胴体上的沙门氏菌发生率更高。大多数因素及其相互作用对所获得的细菌计数有显著(P≤0.05)影响。根据工厂和季节的不同,在46.7%至93.3%、50.0%至100.0%以及74.7%至100.0%的样本中,APC、TCC和ECC分别≤10⁴、≤10²和≤10¹CFU/cm²。在2.5%(雨季)和1.5%(旱季)的样本中,TCC超过10³CFU/cm²。在雨季,去内脏前、胴体最终清洗后以及胴体冷却24小时后的样本中,ECC分别有8.7%、0.3%和1.5%超过10²CFU/cm²;旱季的相应比例分别为3.5%、2.2%和3.0%。随着新检验要求的实施,这些数据应作为未来比较牛肉胴体微生物状况的基线。

相似文献

1
Sources and extent of microbiological contamination of beef carcasses in seven United States slaughtering plants.美国七家屠宰厂牛肉胴体微生物污染的来源及程度
J Food Prot. 1999 Feb;62(2):140-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.2.140.
2
Incidence of Salmonella on beef carcasses relating to the U.S. meat and poultry inspection regulations.与美国肉类和家禽检验法规相关的牛肉胴体上沙门氏菌的发生率。
J Food Prot. 1999 May;62(5):467-73. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.5.467.
3
Extent of beef carcass contamination with Escherichia coli and probabilities of passing U.S. regulatory criteria.
J Food Prot. 1999 Mar;62(3):234-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.3.234.
4
Microbial populations on animal hides and beef carcasses at different stages of slaughter in plants employing multiple-sequential interventions for decontamination.在采用多次连续干预措施进行去污处理的工厂中,处于不同屠宰阶段的动物皮和牛肉胴体上的微生物种群。
J Food Prot. 2000 Aug;63(8):1080-6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.8.1080.
5
Microbial contamination occurring on lamb carcasses processed in the United States.
J Food Prot. 2001 Apr;64(4):503-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-64.4.503.
6
Hygiene indicator microorganisms for selected pathogens on beef, pork, and poultry meats in Belgium.比利时牛肉、猪肉和禽肉上选定病原体的卫生指示微生物。
J Food Prot. 2008 Jan;71(1):35-45. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.1.35.
7
Microbial contamination of meat during the skinning of beef carcass hindquarters at three slaughtering plants.三家屠宰厂在牛胴体后躯去皮过程中肉类的微生物污染情况。
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Jul 21;42(3):175-84. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00074-9.
8
Quantification of Bacteria Indicative of Fecal and Environmental Contamination from Hides to Carcasses.量化源自皮毛至胴体的粪便和环境污染物指示菌。
Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019 Dec;16(12):844-855. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2656. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
9
Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.基于欧盟第2001/471/EC号决定所使用标准的牛肉微生物污染与卫生评估的关系
Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Apr 15;92(2):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.09.010.
10
Microbiological status of Australian sheep meat.澳大利亚羊肉的微生物状况。
J Food Prot. 1999 Apr;62(4):380-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.4.380.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficiency of using lactic acid and beefxide to reduce indicator microorganisms on beef in Mosul slaughterhouse.利用乳酸和牛血来减少摩苏尔屠宰场牛肉中指示微生物的效率。
Open Vet J. 2024 Jul;14(7):1658-1667. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i7.15. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review.肉类安全立法及其创新方法的机遇与障碍:综述
Food Control. 2022 Nov;141:109160. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160.
3
High-Resolution Genomic Comparisons within Serotypes Derived from Beef Feedlot Cattle: Parsing the Roles of Cattle Source, Pen, Animal, Sample Type, and Production Period.
牛源饲料育肥牛来源的血清型内的高分辨率基因组比较:解析牛源、畜栏、动物、样本类型和生产时期的作用。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 May 26;87(12):e0048521. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00485-21.
4
Population Dynamics of within Beef Cattle Cohorts Followed from Single-Dose Metaphylactic Antibiotic Treatment until Slaughter.在单剂量辅助抗生素治疗直至屠宰的肉牛群中 的种群动态。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Nov 14;85(23). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01386-19. Print 2019 Dec 1.
5
Evaluation of Commercial Prototype Bacteriophage Intervention Designed for Reducing O157 and Non-O157 Shiga-Toxigenic (STEC) on Beef Cattle Hide.用于减少肉牛皮上O157和非O157产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)的商用噬菌体干预原型评估。
Foods. 2018 Jul 16;7(7):114. doi: 10.3390/foods7070114.
6
Establishing Statistical Equivalence of Data from Different Sampling Approaches for Assessment of Bacterial Phenotypic Antimicrobial Resistance.建立不同采样方法的数据的统计学等效性,以评估细菌表型抗菌药物耐药性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Apr 16;84(9). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02724-17. Print 2018 May 1.
7
in Peripheral Lymph Nodes of Healthy Cattle at Slaughter.在屠宰时健康牛的外周淋巴结中。
Front Microbiol. 2017 Nov 9;8:2214. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02214. eCollection 2017.
8
Microbiological quality of "khebab" consumed in the accra metropolis.阿克拉大都会区食用的“烤羊肉串”的微生物质量。
Ghana Med J. 2005 Jun;39(2):46-9. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v39i2.35981.
9
Effectiveness of steam pasteurization in controlling microbiological hazards of cull cow carcasses in a commercial plant.蒸汽巴氏杀菌法在商业工厂中控制淘汰奶牛胴体微生物危害方面的有效性。
Can J Vet Res. 2005 Jul;69(3):200-7.