Suppr超能文献

肉类安全立法及其创新方法的机遇与障碍:综述

Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review.

作者信息

Nagel-Alne Gunvor Elise, Murphy Emil, McCauslin Brittany, Hauge Sigrun J, Schrøder-Petersen Dorte Lene, Holthe Janne, Alvseike Ole

机构信息

Animalia - Norwegian Meat and Poultry Research Center, P.O. Box 396, Økern, N-0513, Oslo, Norway.

Deer Industry New Zealand, PO Box 10701, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand.

出版信息

Food Control. 2022 Nov;141:109160. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160.

Abstract

Albert Einstein has been quoted "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them". Innovations are necessary to meet future challenges regarding sustainability, animal welfare, slaughter hygiene, meat safety and quality, not at least for optimal balance between these dimensions. The red meat safety legislation texts from Europe, New Zealand, USA, and global guidelines, were analysed for normative formulations ("how it is or should be done") that may create non-intentional hurdles to innovation and new technology. Detailed descriptions of slaughtering techniques and meat processes may hinder innovative processing from being investigated and implemented. The identified problematic normative phrases typically either conserve conventional technologies or organisation of the work, prescribe solutions where no established method, objective criteria or limits exits, or put forward visions impossible to obtain. The Codex Alimentarius was found to have less normative formulations and more functional demands ("what to achieve") than the national and regional regulations. European, New Zealand's and US' legislation share many similarities and challenges, and they all reflect the prevailing processing methods. Consequences are briefly commented, and alternative objective functional demands suggested. Normative legislation texts provide familiar context easier to understand, but also make legislation voluminous. This review underlines the mutual dependency between risk-based legislation and conditional flexibility, and between functional demands and control activities targeted on measurable objective criteria. The legislation does not have to be either or. Objective normative phrases in legislation can function as a least common multiple if alternative methods are allowed on condition that they fulfil objective criteria. Context and practical advice should mainly come from textbooks, consultants, white papers and in Food Business Operator's own guidelines, among others.

摘要

阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦曾说过:“我们不能用制造问题时的同一思维来解决问题”。创新对于应对未来在可持续性、动物福利、屠宰卫生、肉类安全与质量等方面的挑战是必要的,至少对于在这些方面实现最佳平衡而言是如此。对欧洲、新西兰、美国的红肉安全立法文本以及全球准则进行了分析,以找出那些可能给创新和新技术带来非故意障碍的规范性表述(“事情是如何做的或应该如何做”)。对屠宰技术和肉类加工过程的详细描述可能会阻碍创新性加工方法的研究与实施。所确定的有问题的规范性表述通常要么是维护传统技术或工作组织方式,在没有既定方法、客观标准或限制的情况下规定解决方案,要么提出无法实现的愿景。结果发现,与国家和地区法规相比,《食品法典》的规范性表述较少,而功能性要求(“要实现什么目标”)较多。欧洲、新西兰和美国的立法有许多相似之处和挑战,它们都反映了当前的加工方法。简要评论了相关后果,并提出了替代性的客观功能性要求。规范性立法文本提供了更易于理解的熟悉背景,但也使立法篇幅冗长。这项审查强调了基于风险的立法与有条件灵活性之间,以及功能性要求与针对可衡量客观标准的控制活动之间的相互依存关系。立法不必非此即彼。如果允许采用替代方法,只要这些方法符合客观标准,立法中的客观规范性表述就可以起到最小公倍数的作用。背景信息和实用建议主要应来自教科书、顾问、白皮书以及食品企业经营者自己的指南等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/649e/9290325/16ab256784ef/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验