Yamashita Y, Hirai T, Mukaida H, Yoshimoto A, Kuwahara M, Inoue H, Toge T
Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Surg Today. 1999;29(2):107-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02482233.
To elucidate the necessity of pyloroplasty for the gastric tube through the posterior mediastinum in esophageal surgery, gastric emptying and duodenogastric reflux (DGR) were evaluated in 16 cases undergoing an anterior pylorectomy (group P) and in 16 cases treated by the finger bougie method (group F). First, the obstruction and reflux symptoms were examined based on a patient questionnaire using a brief scoring system. The median value of the symptom score showed the patients in P to have more symptoms than those in F; however, the difference was not significant (8.0 vs 6.0). Secondly, the swallowed Tc O4- (85MBq) was counted using a gamma camera at three sites on the sternal bone in the upright position based on a gastric transit scintigram. Both the descending time of the RI peak and the clearance rates were similar between the two groups. Thirdly, intragastric 24-h pH monitoring was carried out. Antimony pH sensors were anchored 5 and 15cm below the esophagogastrostomy. We could not find any difference between the two groups in both the %time pH > 4 and %time pH > 7. These findings thus revealed no big difference between groups P and F. The finger bougie method to drain the vagotomized posterior mediastinal stomach was found to achieve results similar to conventional pyloroplasty, while it was also simpler and safer.
