• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

习得驱力强度作为非条件刺激强度和条件刺激-非条件刺激配对次数的联合函数:刺激量和分散的条件刺激-非条件刺激配对的影响。

Acquired drive strength as a joint function of UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings: the effect of masses and distributed CS-UCS pairings.

作者信息

Goldstein M L

出版信息

J Gen Psychol. 1976 Oct;95(2d Half):257-86. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1976.9711349.

DOI:10.1080/00221309.1976.9711349
PMID:1003186
Abstract

The empirical law relating acquired drive strength, as measured by the latency of a hurdle-jump response, to UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings was investigated. The effect on acquired drive strength of varying the intervals between successive CS-UCS pairings was also investigated. Ss were 150 male albino rats, 125-160 days old. The apparatus was the classically conditioned fear apparatus. Acquired drive strength was found to be curvillinearly related to UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings when a 10 minute intertrial interval was used. The relationships were monotonic and hegatively accelerated. The effect of UCS intensity on acquired drive strength varied with the length of the intertrial interval. The findings of diverging functions relating UCS intensity to test trials support Spence's notion of multiplicative relationship between habit strength (sHr) and drive (d) in the determination of performance in aversive conditioning.

摘要

研究了通过跨栏跳跃反应潜伏期测量的习得驱力强度与无条件刺激强度及条件刺激-无条件刺激配对次数之间的经验法则。还研究了连续条件刺激-无条件刺激配对之间间隔变化对习得驱力强度的影响。实验对象为150只125 - 160日龄的雄性白化大鼠。实验仪器为经典条件恐惧装置。当使用10分钟的试验间隔时,发现习得驱力强度与无条件刺激强度及条件刺激-无条件刺激配对次数呈曲线相关。这些关系是单调且负加速的。无条件刺激强度对习得驱力强度的影响随试验间隔长度而变化。将无条件刺激强度与测试试验联系起来的发散函数的研究结果支持了斯彭斯关于在厌恶条件作用中习惯强度(sHr)和驱力(d)之间的乘法关系在决定表现方面的观点。

相似文献

1
Acquired drive strength as a joint function of UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings: the effect of masses and distributed CS-UCS pairings.习得驱力强度作为非条件刺激强度和条件刺激-非条件刺激配对次数的联合函数:刺激量和分散的条件刺激-非条件刺激配对的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1976 Oct;95(2d Half):257-86. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1976.9711349.
2
Acquired drive strength as a joint function of UCS intensity and number of CS-UCS pairings.习得驱力强度是无条件刺激强度和条件刺激-无条件刺激配对次数的联合函数。
J Gen Psychol. 1977 Jan;96(1st Half):5-61. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1977.9920798.
3
Conditioned response-contingent delays of the unconditioned stimulus in human aversive conditioning.人类厌恶条件反射中无条件刺激的条件反应依存性延迟
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1975 Sep;1(5):513-20.
4
Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning as a function of number of CS-UCS pairings.作为条件刺激-无条件刺激配对次数函数的同时性和逆向恐惧条件作用
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1976 Apr;2(2):117-29. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.2.2.117.
5
Stimulus compounding in classical fear conditioning.
J Gen Psychol. 1975 Apr;92(2d Half):261-6. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1975.9710852.
6
Drive and reward in an acquired-fear paradigm.习得性恐惧范式中的驱力与奖赏
J Gen Psychol. 1975 Jul;93(2d Half):123-30.
7
Reinforcers in infancy: classical conditioning using stroking or intra-oral infusions of milk as UCS.
Dev Psychobiol. 1988 Apr;21(3):215-23. doi: 10.1002/dev.420210303.
8
EFFECT OF CS-ONSET UCS-TERMINATION DELAY, UCS DURATION, CS-ONSET UCS-ONSET INTERVAL, AND NUMBER OF CS-UCS PAIRINGS ON CONDITIONED FEAR RESPONSE.条件刺激开始至无条件刺激终止的延迟、无条件刺激持续时间、条件刺激开始至无条件刺激开始的间隔以及条件刺激 - 无条件刺激配对次数对条件性恐惧反应的影响。
J Exp Psychol. 1965 Mar;69:287-91. doi: 10.1037/h0021839.
9
Acquisition of an avoidance response in rats during conditioned suppression.大鼠在条件性抑制过程中获得回避反应。
J Gen Psychol. 1980 Oct;103(2d Half):221-5. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1980.9921002.
10
Temporal specificity of fear conditioning: effects of different conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus intervals on the fear-potentiated startle effect.恐惧条件作用的时间特异性:不同条件刺激-非条件刺激间隔对恐惧增强惊吓效应的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Oct;15(4):295-310.