• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用综合冠状动脉血运重建术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的替代方法。

Alternative approach to multivessel coronary disease with integrated coronary revascularization.

作者信息

Zenati M, Cohen H A, Griffith B P

机构信息

Divisions of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Mar;117(3):439-44; discussion 444-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70322-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70322-3
PMID:10047645
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Integrated coronary revascularization combines minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICABG) with left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending artery grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention. We hypothesized that integrated coronary revascularization could result in successful revascularization in suitable patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Between September 1996 and January 1998, 31 consecutive patients underwent integrated coronary revascularization. Twenty-two were male; mean age was 69 years (46-86 years) and 42% were older than 75 years. Eight patients (26%) had a Parsonnet score greater than 20%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 46.3% +/- 12%; 6 patients (19%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35%.

RESULTS

The anastomosis time for MICABG with the internal thoracic artery was 14.6 +/- 5.2 minutes and the operating time was 105 +/- 20 minutes; 28 patients (90%) were extubated in the operating room. The internal thoracic artery anastomosis was patent in all 31 patients (100%). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed before MICABG in 2 patients (7%), on the same day of MICABG in 16 patients (52%), on postoperative day 1 in 3 patients (9%), and on postoperative days 2 to 4 in 10 patients (32%). Postprocedure length of stay in the hospital was 2.7 +/- 1.0 days and 13 patients (42%) were discharged home on postoperative day 1 or 2. Three patients (9.6%) required repeat target vessel revascularization in the distribution of the previous percutaneous coronary intervention. All patients are alive without angina at a follow-up of 10.8 +/- 3.8 months.

CONCLUSION

Our early results demonstrate that integrated coronary revascularization can be performed safely and effectively. Long-term results will be available from a prospective randomized trial now underway to compare integrated coronary revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

摘要

目的

综合性冠状动脉血运重建术是将微创冠状动脉旁路移植术(MICABG)与左胸廓内动脉-左前降支动脉移植术及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相结合。我们假设综合性冠状动脉血运重建术能使合适的多支冠状动脉疾病患者成功实现血运重建。

方法

在1996年9月至1998年1月期间,31例连续患者接受了综合性冠状动脉血运重建术。其中22例为男性;平均年龄69岁(46 - 86岁),42%的患者年龄超过75岁。8例患者(26%)的Parsonnet评分大于20%。左心室射血分数为46.3%±12%;6例患者(19%)的左心室射血分数小于35%。

结果

MICABG与胸廓内动脉的吻合时间为14.6±5.2分钟,手术时间为105±20分钟;28例患者(90%)在手术室拔管。31例患者(100%)的胸廓内动脉吻合均通畅。2例患者(7%)在MICABG前进行了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,16例患者(52%)在MICABG同一天进行了该治疗,3例患者(9%)在术后第1天进行,10例患者(32%)在术后第2至4天进行。术后住院时间为2.7±1.0天,13例患者(42%)在术后第1天或第2天出院回家。3例患者(9.6%)需要对先前经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的靶血管分布区域进行再次血运重建。在10.8±3.8个月的随访中,所有患者均存活且无心绞痛症状。

结论

我们的早期结果表明,综合性冠状动脉血运重建术可以安全有效地实施。目前正在进行一项前瞻性随机试验,以比较综合性冠状动脉血运重建术与多支冠状动脉疾病的冠状动脉旁路移植术,届时将得出长期结果。

相似文献

1
Alternative approach to multivessel coronary disease with integrated coronary revascularization.采用综合冠状动脉血运重建术治疗多支冠状动脉疾病的替代方法。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Mar;117(3):439-44; discussion 444-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70322-3.
2
Integrated coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: immediate and seven-month outcome.药物洗脱支架冠状动脉综合血运重建:即刻及7个月结果
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.058. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
3
Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建的综合微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术和血管成形术。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 Aug;22(2):261-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00262-2.
4
Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting decreases hospital stay and cost.微创冠状动脉搭桥术可缩短住院时间并降低费用。
Ann Surg. 1997 Jun;225(6):805-9; discussion 809-11. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199706000-00018.
5
Hybrid revascularization feasibility in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting combined with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease.急性冠状动脉综合征合并多支血管病变患者行微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术联合经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术时的杂交血运重建可行性
Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001 Dec;49(12):700-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02913508.
6
Preoperative risk models for minimally invasive coronary bypass: a preliminary study.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Oct;116(4):584-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70164-3.
7
Long-Term Outcome of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.接受微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的长期预后:单中心经验
Innovations (Phila). 2018 Jan/Feb;13(1):23-28. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000466.
8
Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization.微创杂交冠状动脉血运重建术。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1856-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.034.
9
Feasibility of combined percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Circulation. 1998 Sep 15;98(11):1048-50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.11.1048.
10
Early experience with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting with the internal thoracic artery.使用胸廓内动脉进行微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术的早期经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 May;117(5):873-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70366-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus conventional Coronary Artery Bypass surgery in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in a real-world setting: In-hospital outcomes and medium-term follow-up: COHOS study.真实世界中多支冠状动脉疾病患者杂交冠状动脉血运重建与传统冠状动脉搭桥手术的比较:住院结局及中期随访:COHOS研究
Indian Heart J. 2025 Mar-Apr;77(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
2
Incomplete revascularization: what the surgeon needs to know.不完全血运重建:外科医生需要了解的内容。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Jul;7(4):463-469. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.06.07.
3
Status quo of hybrid coronary revascularization for multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
多支血管病变的杂交冠状动脉血运重建现状。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2268-77. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.093.
4
Hybrid coronary revascularization as a safe, feasible, and viable alternative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: what is the current evidence?杂交冠状动脉血运重建术作为传统冠状动脉旁路移植术的一种安全、可行且有效的替代方案:当前证据有哪些?
Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:142616. doi: 10.1155/2013/142616. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
5
Combining PCI and CABG: the role of hybrid revascularization.PCI 与 CABG 联合治疗:杂交血运重建的作用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Apr;15(4):351. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0351-9.
6
Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术的现状
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;56(6):260-7. doi: 10.1007/s11748-008-0251-x. Epub 2008 Jun 18.