Pachner A R, Schaefer H, Amemiya K, Cadavid D, Zhang W F, Reddy K, O'Neill T
Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1998 Dec 23;110(24):870-3.
The diagnosis of human LNB can be difficult, because its major clinical manifestations--meningitis, facial palsy, radiculitis, and neuritis--are non-specific and the characteristic skin lesion is usually absent at the time of neurological involvement. Thus, CSF assays are often used in diagnosis. Culture of CSF is rarely performed because it has a low yield and requires special culture medium. PCR of the CSF identified spirochetal DNA in clinical specimens with greater sensitivity, but it suffers from a number of disadvantages. Measurement of specific antibody in the CSF also has its limitations. The role of available assays for LNB has not been studied carefully in a comparative investigation. The recent development of the nonhumane primate (NHP) model of LNB allows us to address this need in a faithful model of human LNB. We compared PCR and culture in their ability to detect spirochetal presence in the CSF and brain tissue of infected NHPs, and related these measures of infection to the development of anti-B. burgdorferi antibody. We also tested a bioassay, the mouse infectivity test (MIT), in this model. Using these four assays (PCR, culture, MIT, and CSF Ab) at least one assay for spirochetal presence in CSFs from NHPs was positive in 87% of CSFs tested during early infection in the CNS. Detection of spirochetal presence by PCR, MIT, and culture in the CSF was inversely related to the concomitant presence of anti-B. burgdorferi antibody intrathecally. The performance of any particular test was associated with the strength of the host immune response. In early CNS infection, when anti-B. burgdorferi antibody had not yet appeared, or in immunocompromised hosts, the MIT compared favorably to culture and PCR in infected NHPs; antibody in the CSF was the most useful assay in immunocompetent NHPs. This is the first study demonstrating that a bioassay using inoculation of mice, the mouse infectivity test (MIT), has potential as a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of LNB. The MIT for LNB was modeled after the rabbit infectivity test or RIT, which is considered the "gold standard" for the diagnosis of the related CNS infection, neurosyphilis, and felt to be very sensitive and specific. The presence of specific anti-B. burgdorferi antibody in the CSF is the most widely used assay for Lyme neuroborreliosis. In the immunocompetent NHPs in our study it was a very successful assay for detection of CNS invasion. However, it is frequently false-negative, especially early in the course of the infection, or if there is transient immunosuppression. Transient suppression of the anti-B. burgdorferi immune response in the human could occur in instances of co-infection, i.e. simultaneous transmission via the tick of another pathogen other than B. burgdorferi. Thus, mild immunosuppression as accomplished in our NHPs with corticosteroids was designed to mimic conditions in the human host which allow B. burgdorferi in the natural state to gain a firm foothold in the central nervous system in the 10-15% of B. burgdorferi-infected patients who develop clinically symptomatic nervous system disease. This study is the first to compare utility of available diagnostic techniques in LNB in which necropsy proved presence of infection in the CNS. None of the assays was ideal for all conditions, and the utility of the assay was associated with the host immune status. The differences in the responses of immunocompromised and immunocompetent NHPs in this study were striking. In immunocompetent NHPs the window of opportunity for CNS invasion prior to the development of CSF antibody was brief, and the chance of detection of spirochete low by any of the three techniques used (i.e. culture, PCR, or MIT); in this group, measurement of CSF antibody was generally diagnostic. In immunocompromised NHPs, intrathecal antibody production was delayed, and this helpful diagnostic assay was false-negative; diagnosis required more labor-intensive assays such as PCR, culture, an
人类莱姆神经疏螺旋体病(LNB)的诊断可能具有挑战性,因为其主要临床表现——脑膜炎、面神经麻痹、神经根炎和神经炎——都不具有特异性,而且在出现神经受累时通常没有特征性皮肤病变。因此,脑脊液检测常被用于诊断。脑脊液培养很少进行,因为其阳性率低且需要特殊培养基。脑脊液的聚合酶链反应(PCR)能以更高的灵敏度在临床标本中鉴定出螺旋体DNA,但它也有一些缺点。检测脑脊液中的特异性抗体也有其局限性。在一项比较研究中,尚未对现有的LNB检测方法的作用进行仔细研究。最近开发的非人灵长类动物(NHP)LNB模型使我们能够在忠实模拟人类LNB的模型中满足这一需求。我们比较了PCR和培养法检测感染NHP的脑脊液和脑组织中螺旋体存在的能力,并将这些感染指标与抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体的产生相关联。我们还在该模型中测试了一种生物测定法,即小鼠感染性试验(MIT)。使用这四种检测方法(PCR、培养、MIT和脑脊液抗体检测),在中枢神经系统早期感染期间,检测NHP脑脊液中螺旋体存在的至少一种检测方法在87%的检测脑脊液中呈阳性。通过PCR、MIT和培养法检测脑脊液中螺旋体的存在与鞘内抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体的同时存在呈负相关。任何特定检测方法的性能都与宿主免疫反应的强度有关。在中枢神经系统早期感染时,当抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体尚未出现时,或在免疫功能低下的宿主中,在感染的NHP中,MIT与培养法和PCR法相比具有优势;脑脊液中的抗体检测在免疫功能正常的NHP中是最有用的检测方法。这是第一项证明使用小鼠接种的生物测定法——小鼠感染性试验(MIT)——有潜力作为LNB诊断有用辅助手段的研究。LNB的MIT是仿照兔感染性试验(RIT)建立的,RIT被认为是相关中枢神经系统感染——神经梅毒诊断的“金标准”,并且被认为非常敏感和特异。脑脊液中特异性抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体的检测是莱姆神经疏螺旋体病最广泛使用的检测方法。在我们研究中的免疫功能正常的NHP中,它是检测中枢神经系统感染的一种非常成功的检测方法。然而,它经常出现假阴性,尤其是在感染过程早期,或者存在短暂免疫抑制的情况下。人类抗伯氏疏螺旋体免疫反应的短暂抑制可能发生在合并感染的情况下,即除伯氏疏螺旋体之外的另一种病原体通过蜱同时传播。因此,我们用皮质类固醇在NHP中实现的轻度免疫抑制旨在模拟人类宿主中的情况,这种情况使10% - 15%出现临床症状性神经系统疾病的伯氏疏螺旋体感染患者中处于自然状态的伯氏疏螺旋体能够在中枢神经系统中站稳脚跟。这项研究是首次比较现有诊断技术在LNB中的效用,其中尸检证明中枢神经系统存在感染。没有一种检测方法对所有情况都是理想的,检测方法的效用与宿主免疫状态有关。在这项研究中,免疫功能低下和免疫功能正常的NHP的反应差异显著。在免疫功能正常的NHP中,在脑脊液抗体产生之前中枢神经系统被入侵的机会窗口很短暂,并且使用的三种技术(即培养、PCR或MIT)中任何一种检测到螺旋体的机会都很低;在这个组中,脑脊液抗体检测通常具有诊断价值。在免疫功能低下的NHP中,鞘内抗体产生延迟,这种有用的诊断检测呈假阴性;诊断需要更耗费人力的检测方法,如PCR、培养,以及……