Yap W S, Peterson G M, Vial J H, Randall C T, Greenaway T M
Tasmanian School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Science, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1998 Dec;23(6):457-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1998.00185.x.
Commonly used drugs for type 2 diabetes are not ideal. The sulphonylureas, especially potent and long-acting agents such as glibenclamide, can induce hypoglycaemia, while metformin carries the risk of lactic acidosis.
To review the management of type 2 diabetes at the major teaching hospital in Tasmania, Australia, principally to determine the extent of use of glibenclamide and metformin in the elderly and patients where published contraindications are present.
A retrospective review of the medical records for 150 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes admitted to the hospital in mid-1997, was performed. An extensive range of demographic and clinical variables was recorded for each patient. These included the duration of type 2 diabetes, the presence of other medical conditions, medication history, presence of any contraindications to the use of metformin or sulphonylureas, biochemical measures of diabetic control, and the presence of any diabetic complications.
The mean (+/-SD) age of the 150 patients included in the study was 70.1+/-11.8 years. The mean body mass index was 28.7+/-6.2 kg/m2 and the mean recent HbA1c level was 86+/-21%; only 24.7% of patients had a HbA1c level of 7% or lower. Of the 45 patients using glibenclamide, 40 (88.9%) had one or more risk factors for hypoglycaemia: over 65 years of age, renal impairment, or cognitive impairment and living alone. The study also found an extensive use of metformin in patients with contraindications and at highest risk of developing lactic acidosis. Sixty-six out of 70 patients (94%) using metformin had at least one contraindication according to the manufacturer's prescribing information, 57% of patients had two or three contraindications and 14% of patients had more than three contraindications. More than 20% of the patients had a renal function below published exclusion criteria.
There was evidence of over-utilization of metformin and glibenclamide in type 2 diabetes patients most at risk of adverse reactions. Insulin therapy could be a safer and more effective management strategy in many of these patients.
常用的2型糖尿病药物并不理想。磺脲类药物,尤其是强效长效制剂如格列本脲,可诱发低血糖,而二甲双胍有乳酸酸中毒风险。
回顾澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚主要教学医院2型糖尿病的管理情况,主要确定格列本脲和二甲双胍在老年人及存在已公布的禁忌证患者中的使用程度。
对1997年年中连续收治的150例2型糖尿病患者的病历进行回顾性研究。记录了每位患者广泛的人口统计学和临床变量。这些变量包括2型糖尿病病程、其他疾病情况、用药史、使用二甲双胍或磺脲类药物的任何禁忌证、糖尿病控制的生化指标以及任何糖尿病并发症。
纳入研究的150例患者的平均(±标准差)年龄为70.1±11.8岁。平均体重指数为28.7±6.2kg/m²,近期糖化血红蛋白平均水平为86±21%;只有24.7%的患者糖化血红蛋白水平在7%或更低。在使用格列本脲的45例患者中,40例(88.9%)有一项或多项低血糖风险因素:65岁以上、肾功能损害、认知障碍或独居。该研究还发现,二甲双胍在有禁忌证且发生乳酸酸中毒风险最高的患者中广泛使用。根据制造商的处方信息,70例使用二甲双胍的患者中有66例(94%)至少有一项禁忌证,57%的患者有两项或三项禁忌证,14%的患者有三项以上禁忌证。超过20%的患者肾功能低于已公布的排除标准。
有证据表明,在最易发生不良反应的2型糖尿病患者中,二甲双胍和格列本脲存在过度使用的情况。对许多此类患者而言,胰岛素治疗可能是一种更安全有效的管理策略。