• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effectiveness of single and multiple applications of triple dye on umbilical cord separation time.

作者信息

Hsu C F, Wang C C, Yuh Y S, Chen Y H, Chu M L

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 1999 Feb;158(2):144-6. doi: 10.1007/s004310051035.

DOI:10.1007/s004310051035
PMID:10048612
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The effectiveness of single and multiple applications of triple dye for umbilical cord care in the umbilical cord separation time (UCST) was evaluated in 180 neonates. Seven neonates were excluded, three where the cord stump separation time was uncertain and four to whom contact was lost. The participating neonates were randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1, 101 neonates, were treated with a regimen of a single application of triple dye. Group 2, 79 neonates, were treated with multiple applications of triple dye. Complete information was obtained from 97 neonates (96.2%) in group 1 and 76 (96%) in group 2. The UCST was 12.6 +/- 0.45 (mean +/- SE) days in group 1 and 16.68 +/- 0.65 days in group 2 (P < 0.0001) and showed no significant association with infants' gender, mode of delivery, gravidity, gestational age, birth weight, or hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

A single application of triple dye may be a more favourable regimen with a similarly antimicrobial effect, a shorter UCST and may be more cost effective than multiple applications of triple dye in umbilical cord care.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of single and multiple applications of triple dye on umbilical cord separation time.
Eur J Pediatr. 1999 Feb;158(2):144-6. doi: 10.1007/s004310051035.
2
To dye or not to dye: a randomized, clinical trial of a triple dye/alcohol regime versus dry cord care.是否进行脐带染色:一项关于三联染料/酒精方案与脐带干燥护理的随机临床试验
Pediatrics. 2003 Jan;111(1):15-20. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.1.15.
3
Umbilical cord care. A study of bacitracin ointment vs. triple dye.脐带护理。杆菌肽软膏与三联染料的对比研究。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1984 Jun;23(6):342-4. doi: 10.1177/000992288402300609.
4
Triple dye plus rubbing alcohol versus triple dye alone for umbilical cord care.三联染料加外用酒精与单用三联染料用于脐带护理的比较。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010 Jan;49(1):45-8. doi: 10.1177/0009922808329455.
5
A randomized study of 3 umbilical cord care regimens at home in thai neonates: comparison of time to umbilical cord separation, parental satisfaction and bacterial colonization.泰国新生儿在家中三种脐带护理方案的随机研究:脐带脱落时间、家长满意度及细菌定植情况的比较
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jul;88(7):967-72.
6
Randomized trial of alcohol versus triple dye for umbilical cord care.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2002 Jul-Aug;41(6):419-23. doi: 10.1177/000992280204100607.
7
An audit of the effect of two cord-care regimens on bacterial colonization in newborn infants.
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1987 Mar;13(3):109-13. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30117-8.
8
The effect of isopropyl alcohol and triple dye on umbilical cord separation time.
Mil Med. 1985 Jan;150(1):49-50.
9
Group B streptococcal colonization in a newborn nursery: effects of iodophor and triple dye cord care.新生儿重症监护室中B族链球菌定植:碘伏和三联染料脐带护理的效果
South Med J. 1977 Aug;70(8):978-9. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197708000-00023.
10
The effectiveness of single and multiple applications of triple dye on umbilical cord separation time.三联染料单次及多次应用对脐带脱落时间的有效性。
Eur J Pediatr. 2000 Jan-Feb;159(1-2):126-7. doi: 10.1007/s004310050028.

引用本文的文献

1
Umbilical cord antiseptics for preventing sepsis and death among newborns.用于预防新生儿败血症和死亡的脐带防腐剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD008635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008635.pub2.
2
Topical umbilical cord care at birth.出生时脐带局部护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(3):CD001057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001057.pub2.