Tao Q, McAllister S D, Andreassi J, Nowell K W, Cabral G A, Hurst D P, Bachtel K, Ekman M C, Reggio P H, Abood M E
Department of Pharmacology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0524, USA.
Mol Pharmacol. 1999 Mar;55(3):605-13.
The human cannabinoid receptors, central cannabinoid receptor (CB1) and peripheral cannabinoid receptor (CB2), share only 44% amino acid identity overall, yet most ligands do not discriminate between receptor subtypes. Site-directed mutagenesis was employed as a means of mapping the ligand recognition site for the human CB2 cannabinoid receptor. A lysine residue in the third transmembrane domain of the CB2 receptor (K109), which is conserved between the CB1 and CB2 receptors, was mutated to alanine or arginine to determine the role of this charged amino acid in receptor function. The analogous mutation in the CB1 receptor (K192A) was found to be crucial for recognition of several cannabinoid compounds excluding (R)-(+)-2, 3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1, 4-benzoxazin-6-ylmethanone (WIN 55,212-2). In contrast, in human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells expressing the mutant or wild-type CB2 receptors, we found no significant differences in either the binding profile of several cannabinoid ligands nor in inhibition of cAMP accumulation. We identified a high-affinity site for (-)-3-[2-hydroxyl-4-(1, 1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-[3-hydroxyl propyl] cyclohexan-1-ol (CP-55,940) in the region of helices 3, 6, and 7, with S3.31(112), T3.35(116), and N7.49(295) in the K109A mutant using molecular modeling. The serine residue, unique to the CB2 receptor, was then mutated to glycine in the K109A mutant. This double mutant, K109AS112G, retains the ability to bind aminoalkylindoles but loses affinity for classical cannabinoids, as predicted by the molecular model. Distinct cellular localization of the mutant receptors observed with immunofluorescence also suggests differences in receptor function. In summary, we identified amino acid residues in the CB2 receptor that could lead to subtype specificity.
人类大麻素受体,即中枢大麻素受体(CB1)和外周大麻素受体(CB2),总体上氨基酸序列仅有44%的一致性,但大多数配体无法区分这两种受体亚型。采用定点诱变技术来绘制人类CB2大麻素受体的配体识别位点图谱。CB2受体第三个跨膜结构域中的一个赖氨酸残基(K109),在CB1和CB2受体中保守,将其突变为丙氨酸或精氨酸,以确定这个带电荷氨基酸在受体功能中的作用。CB1受体中的类似突变(K192A)被发现对于识别几种大麻素化合物至关重要,但不包括(R)-(+)-2,3-二氢-5-甲基-3-[(4-吗啉基)甲基]吡咯并[1,2,3-de]-1,4-苯并恶嗪-6-基甲酮(WIN 55,212-2)。相比之下,在表达突变型或野生型CB2受体的人胚肾(HEK)-293细胞中,我们发现几种大麻素配体的结合情况以及对环磷酸腺苷(cAMP)积累的抑制作用均无显著差异。利用分子建模,我们在螺旋3、6和7区域确定了(-)-3-[2-羟基-4-(1,1-二甲基庚基)苯基]-4-[3-羟基丙基]环己醇(CP-55,940)在K109A突变体中的一个高亲和力位点,该位点涉及S3.31(112)、T3.35(116)和N7.49(295)。然后,将CB2受体特有的丝氨酸残基在K109A突变体中突变为甘氨酸。如分子模型所预测的,这个双突变体K109AS112G保留了结合氨基烷基吲哚的能力,但失去了对经典大麻素的亲和力。通过免疫荧光观察到的突变受体的不同细胞定位也表明受体功能存在差异。总之,我们确定了CB2受体中可能导致亚型特异性的氨基酸残基。