Harrison B D
Q J Med. 1976 Oct;45(180):625-45.
In sixteen patients with upper airway obstruction, breathlessness was a symptom in all with maximum mid vital capacity flow rates in inspiration or expiration of 1-7 litres per second or less. With one exception, all these patients had stridor. The stridor was inspiratory in nine, expiratory in one and both inspiratory and expiratory in two. There was no diagnostic difficulty in the twelve patients with extrathoracic airway obstruction and in this group tests of inspiratory flow (forced inspired volume in one second, peak inspiratory flow or maximum mid inspiratory flow) were of most value in following the progression of the disease and the response to treatment. Flow volume loops were particularly useful where extrathoracic obstruction and diffuse intrapulmonary airway obstruction co-existed. The two patients with intrathoracic upper airway obstruction caused considerable difficulty with diagnosis and both were initially thought to have, and treated unsuccessfully for, asthma. In each patient flow volume loops showed a low flow expiratory plateau, diagnostic of severe intrathoracic airway obstruction but recorded in the absence of any clinical or radiographic features of emphysema. An obstructing lesion of the intrathoracic trachea was therefore suspected and this was confirmed by tracheal tomography. In one patient serial expiratory flow volume curves demonstrated the combination of intrathoracic upper and lower airway obstruction. Two patients had tracheal stenosis in the region of the suprasternal notch. Each showed a characteristic twin humped expiratory flow volume curve and in one patient the stenosis was demonstrated both physiologically and radiologically to move in and out of the thorax. The importance of a standard posture during serial measurements is emphasized. The ratio of forced expired volume in one second measured in millilitres, to the peak expiratory flow measured in litres per minute, was of limited value if differentiating upper from lower airway obstruction in these patients. It is concluded that upper airway obstruction is likely to become more common and that respiratory function tests, in particular the flow volume loop, play an essential part in the recognition and management of this problem.
在16例上气道梗阻患者中,所有患者均有呼吸困难症状,吸气或呼气时的最大用力肺活量流速为每秒1 - 7升或更低。除1例患者外,所有这些患者均有喘鸣。其中9例患者喘鸣为吸气性,1例为呼气性,2例为吸气和呼气性。12例胸外气道梗阻患者的诊断没有困难,在这组患者中,吸气流量测试(一秒用力吸气量、最大吸气流量或最大用力吸气中期流量)在跟踪疾病进展和治疗反应方面最有价值。流量 - 容积环在胸外梗阻和弥漫性肺内气道梗阻并存时特别有用。2例胸内上气道梗阻患者的诊断存在相当大的困难,最初均被认为患有哮喘并接受了无效治疗。在每例患者中,流量 - 容积环均显示出低流量呼气平台,这是严重胸内气道梗阻的诊断依据,但在没有任何肺气肿临床或影像学特征的情况下记录到。因此怀疑存在胸内气管阻塞性病变,并通过气管断层扫描得到证实。1例患者的系列呼气流量 - 容积曲线显示了胸内上、下气道梗阻并存的情况。2例患者在胸骨上切迹区域存在气管狭窄。每例患者均显示出特征性的双峰呼气流量 - 容积曲线,其中1例患者的狭窄在生理和影像学上均显示可随胸廓进出。强调了在系列测量过程中保持标准姿势的重要性。在这些患者中,以毫升为单位测量的一秒用力呼气量与以升/分钟为单位测量的最大呼气流量之比,在区分上、下气道梗阻方面价值有限。得出的结论是,上气道梗阻可能会变得更加常见,呼吸功能测试,特别是流量 - 容积环,在识别和处理这个问题中起着至关重要的作用。