• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Preverbal, Early Verbal Pediatric Pain Scale (PEPPS): development and early psychometric testing.

作者信息

Schultz A A, Murphy E, Morton J, Stempel A, Messenger-Rioux C, Bennett K

机构信息

Maine Medical Center, Portland 04102, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Feb;14(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(99)80056-6.

DOI:10.1016/S0882-5963(99)80056-6
PMID:10063245
Abstract

The Pre-Verbal, Early Verbal Pediatric Pain Scale (PEPPS) is conceptualized to measure the established pain response in toddlers, a pediatric group void of pain assessment scales. It consists of seven categories, each with weighted indicators. Scores can range from 0 to 26. Using a blinded, cross-sectional design, 40 children, aged 12 to 24 months, were videotaped throughout their postoperative stay in the postanesthesia care unit. Vignettes were randomly selected and viewed by four experienced pediatric nurses. Results indicated that the PEPPS was easy to use and demonstrated acceptable inter-rater and intrarater reliability. Early evidence of construct validity was established by statistically significant differences in premedication and postmedication pain scores.

摘要

相似文献

1
Preverbal, Early Verbal Pediatric Pain Scale (PEPPS): development and early psychometric testing.
J Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Feb;14(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(99)80056-6.
2
Reliability and validity of the modified preverbal, early verbal pediatric pain scale in emergency department pediatric patients.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2011 Oct;19(4):178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
3
Development and preliminary psychometric testing of the Multidimensional Assessment of Pain Scale: MAPS.疼痛量表多维评估(MAPS)的编制与初步心理测量学测试
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Apr;17(4):333-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02115.x.
4
Assessment of the validity and reliability of the University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital Pain scale for Preverbal and Nonverbal Children.威斯康星大学儿童医院针对学前期及无法用言语表达的儿童的疼痛量表的效度和信度评估。
Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Nov-Dec;25(6):670-6.
5
The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.儿科重症监护中的COMFORT行为量表和改良的FLACC量表。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):122-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00323.x.
6
Analysis of the validation of existing behavioral pain and distress scales for use in the procedural setting.用于程序设置的现有行为疼痛和痛苦量表的验证分析。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Aug;17(8):720-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2007.02218.x.
7
[Critical aspects of an outside evaluation of postoperative pain in infants. A placebo-controlled double-blind study of the question of the reliability and validity of the measurement system].[婴儿术后疼痛外部评估的关键方面。关于测量系统可靠性和有效性问题的安慰剂对照双盲研究]
Anaesthesist. 1990 Mar;39(3):151-7.
8
Validity and reliability of the Behavioural Observational Pain Scale for postoperative pain measurement in children 1-7 years of age.1-7岁儿童术后疼痛测量行为观察疼痛量表的效度和信度
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;8(2):102-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000257098.32268.AA.
9
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
10
Cross-validation of the Children's and Infants' Postoperative Pain Scale in Brazilian Children.《儿童与婴儿术后疼痛量表在巴西儿童中的交叉验证》
Pain Pract. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):171-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00192.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale, the MBPS and the Observer Applied Visual Analogue Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.用于评估操作疼痛的面部表情、腿活动、活动、哭泣和安慰量表(FLACC量表)、改良行为疼痛量表(MBPS)及观察者应用视觉模拟量表的心理测量特性比较
J Pain Res. 2021 Mar 31;14:881-892. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S267839. eCollection 2021.