• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[哪些患者需要哪种造口?]

[What patient needs which stoma?].

作者信息

Säuberli H, Tedaldi R

机构信息

Chirurgische Klinik, Kantonsspital Baden, Schweiz.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(12):1370-4.

PMID:10063547
Abstract

Patients with small bowel obstruction hardly ever need a stoma. Advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis (mostly due to colorectal or ovarial cancer) may require a proximal palliative fecal diversion. Likewise stomatas for colonic ileus became less frequent. The type of the stoma and its necessity depend on the patient's condition, on the duration and the cause of the obstruction, i.e. on the condition and the damage of the bowel. Terminal sigmoidostomy has its place mainly as a part of the Hartmann's procedure treating sigmoid diverticulitis with inflammatory pseudotumor, with free perforation and diffuse peritonitis. For oncological reasons Hartmann's resection should not be performed for rectal cancer--except for very old patients in bad condition. Colonic ileus due to colorectal cancer can usually be treated by resection and primary anastomosis. In case of delayed ileus it may be better to resect the proximal colon and to perform an ileocolostomy to avoid complications. Risky anastomoses due to damaged bowel or for patients in bad condition may be protected by a loop-ileostomy or a loop transverse colostomy. They are both easy to perform and to close with very few complications. Summarizing we may conclude that very few patients really need a stoma today--patients showing special risks such as diffuse peritonitis, absceding inflammation or damaged bowel as a result of delayed ileus.

摘要

小肠梗阻患者很少需要造口。晚期腹膜癌(主要由结直肠癌或卵巢癌引起)可能需要近端姑息性粪便转流。同样,用于结肠梗阻的造口也变得不那么常见了。造口的类型及其必要性取决于患者的病情、梗阻的持续时间和原因,即取决于肠道的状况和损伤程度。末端乙状结肠造口主要作为哈特曼手术的一部分,用于治疗伴有炎性假瘤、游离穿孔和弥漫性腹膜炎的乙状结肠憩室炎。出于肿瘤学原因,除了病情很差的老年患者外,直肠癌不应进行哈特曼切除术。结直肠癌引起的结肠梗阻通常可通过切除和一期吻合术治疗。对于延迟性肠梗阻,切除近端结肠并进行回结肠造口术可能更好,以避免并发症。因肠道受损或患者病情较差而有风险的吻合口可通过袢式回肠造口术或袢式横结肠造口术进行保护。这两种造口术都易于实施和关闭,并发症很少。总之,我们可以得出结论,如今真正需要造口的患者很少——那些存在特殊风险的患者,如弥漫性腹膜炎、脓肿性炎症或因延迟性肠梗阻导致肠道受损的患者。

相似文献

1
[What patient needs which stoma?].[哪些患者需要哪种造口?]
Zentralbl Chir. 1998;123(12):1370-4.
2
Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision.比较回肠袢式造口术和横结肠袢式造口术在全直肠系膜切除术后粪便转流中的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2002 Jun;89(6):704-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02082.x.
3
[Early stoma closure in colorectal resections after endoscopic monitoring of the anastomosis. Clinical results].[内镜监测吻合口后结直肠切除术中早期造口关闭。临床结果]
Chir Ital. 2007 Jul-Aug;59(4):507-12.
4
Surgical options for left-sided large bowel emergencies.左侧大肠急症的手术选择。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Nov;73(6):394-6; discussion 397.
5
[Ileostomy versus colostomy as temporary deviation stoma in relation to stoma closure].回肠造口术与结肠造口术作为临时改道造口在造口关闭方面的比较
Chirurg. 1988 Dec;59(12):842-4.
6
[The stoma in peritonitis and pancreatitis].[腹膜炎和胰腺炎中的造口]
Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124 Suppl 2:18-20.
7
Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study.功能性回肠造口术联合低位前切除术治疗低位直肠癌:我们应该将回肠造口术作为常规手术吗?一项前瞻性随机研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Sep-Oct;55(86-87):1562-7.
8
[Intestinal occlusion caused by malignant neoplasia of the colon: surgical strategy].[结肠癌恶性肿瘤所致肠梗阻:手术策略]
G Chir. 2003 Mar;24(3):86-91.
9
Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomised trial.结直肠吻合术后行结肠造口术还是回肠造口术?一项随机试验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1987 Jan;69(1):5-7.
10
A comparison of complications associated with colostomy reversal versus ileostomy reversal.结肠造口回纳术与回肠造口回纳术相关并发症的比较。
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):717-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.009.